Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=118 Randomized Single-blind Prevention

Effects of Foot Strengthening on the Incidence of Injuries in Long Distance Runners

Leg Injuries

Enrolled (actual)
118
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Running Related Lower Limb Injuries — 20; 8 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Foot and ankle strengthening (Other)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Primary completion
Mar 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Running Related Lower Limb Injuries
20; 8
SECONDARY
Time to the First Injury
10.15; 7.63
SECONDARY
Toes and Hallux Muscle Strength
25.61; 27.31
SECONDARY
Foot Muscles Hypertrophy (Volume)
13.3; 13.7; 13.3; 12.5; 12.0; 11.2
SECONDARY
Foot Health and Functionality
83; 92; 100; 100
SECONDARY
Foot and Ankle Running Kinematics
2.88; 0.17
SECONDARY
Ground Reaction Forces During Running
1.09; 1.14; -0.24; -0.24
SECONDARY
Foot Inversion During Running
-3.51; -5.74
SECONDARY
Foot Eversion During Running
6.39; 5.90
SECONDARY
Vertical Loading Rate Force During Running
72.84; 77.17

Summary

The main objective of this trial is to investigate the effects of a training protocol for the foot and ankle complex on the prevalence of running related injuries on long distance runners.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • practice long distance (more than 5 km) running for at least one year;
  • run at least 20 km a week;

Exclusion Criteria

  • run using minimalist shoes or barefoot;
  • having prior experience in isolated foot and ankle strength training within the last year;
  • have any health condition that affect gait and running;
  • being receiving any physical therapy intervention;
  • having any running related injuries during the last two months.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02306148). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search