N/A
N=100
Femoral Central Venous Access Comparison of 2 Methods
Child
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02318940 ↗Enrolled (actual)
100
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Installation on the First Try — 18; 42 percentage of participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- central venous catheter (Device)
- Age
- Pediatric · 0+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of Chile
- Primary completion
- May 2016
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Installation on the First Try |
18; 42 | — |
| SECONDARY Successful Installation |
51; 84 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Attempts |
9; 21; 4; 18; 6; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Arterial Puncture |
25; 10 | — |
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of the installation of femoral central venous catheter (CVC) ultrasound-guided real-time 2D versus the landmark method
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Need for central venous access
Exclusion Criteria
- More than 15 years.
- Local infection at the puncture site
- Anatomical and / or functional vascular alteration known
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02318940). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.