N/A
Completed N=100
Femoral Central Venous Access Comparison of 2 Methods
Child
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02318940 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
100
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2016
Primary outcomePrimary: Installation on the First Try — 18; 42 percentage of participants
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of the installation of femoral central venous catheter (CVC) ultrasound-guided real-time 2D versus the landmark method
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Installation on the First Try |
18; 42 | — |
| SECONDARY Successful Installation |
51; 84 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Attempts |
9; 21; 4; 18; 6; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Arterial Puncture |
25; 10 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Need for central venous access
Exclusion Criteria
- More than 15 years.
- Local infection at the puncture site
- Anatomical and / or functional vascular alteration known
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02318940). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.