Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=44 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Sugammadex Provide Better Surgical Condition Compared With Neostigmine in Laryngeal Microsurgery.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02330172 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
44
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Laryngoscopic Score — 1; 0; 11; 0 Participants — p=0.05

Summary

This study aims to make a comparison of surgical condition and recovery time between rocuronium 0.45 mg/kg and neostigmine group and rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg and sugammadex group.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Laryngoscopic Score
1; 0; 11; 0; 9; 19 0.05
SECONDARY
Recovery Time From Neuromuscular Blockade
9.9; 2.1 0.05

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical status classification 1 or 2 elective laryngeal microsurgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

  • BMI >25 or 40 IU/L, Cr > 1.4 mg/dl
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02330172). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search