Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=300 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Topically Applied TV 45070 Ointment in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

Postherpetic Neuralgia

Enrolled (actual)
300
Serious AEs
0.3%
Results posted
Oct 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures — 5.37; 5.60; 5.51; -1.64 units on a scale — p=0.130

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
TV-45070 (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Primary completion
May 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
5.37; 5.60; 5.51; -1.64; -1.71; -1.90 0.130
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Recorded in the Evening Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
5.45; 5.66; 5.58; -1.70; -1.73; -1.96 0.128
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Recorded in the Morning Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
5.30; 5.53; 5.44; -1.60; -1.68; -1.84 0.177
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Worst Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores Recorded in the Evening Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
6.09; 6.35; 6.09; -1.73; -1.83; -1.97 0.202
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With >=30% and >=50% Improvement From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at Week 4 Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
43.9; 43.9; 47.0; 22.4; 25.5; 28.0 0.815
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Total Score Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
41.9; 44.0; 44.0; -8.1; -9.9; -10.8 0.251
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Neuropathic Pain Impact on Quality of Life (NePIQoL) Total Score
127.1; 126.5; 127.6; -11.5; 11.3; -12.6 0.609
SECONDARY
Participants' Global Assess of Treatment as Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Weeks 2 and 4 Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
2.9; 2.9; 2.7; 2.6; 2.5; 2.4 0.166
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in the Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
4.5; 4.4; 4.4; -1.1; -1.1; -1.3 0.311
SECONDARY
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for First Time to Reach 30% or More Sustained Improvement in Weekly Average of the Daily Average NRS Pain Scores
NA; NA; NA 0.245
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in Maximal Intensity of Brush-Evoked Allodynia as Measured on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
1.6; 1.8; 2.0; -0.7; -1.0; -0.8 0.556
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4 in Maximal Intensity of Punctate-Evoked Hyperalgesia as Measured on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM)
2.4; 3.0; 2.8; -1.0; -1.3; -1.1 0.563
SECONDARY
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
15; 32; 24; 0; 1; 0

Summary

This is a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 4% and 8% w/w TV 45070 ointment compared with placebo ointment applied topically and twice daily to the area of PHN pain for 4 weeks in patients with PHN

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient has chronic Postherpetic Neuralgia (PHN), defined as pain present for more than 6 months and less than 10 years after onset of herpes zoster skin rash affecting a single dermatome. Patients with more than 1 involved dermatome may also be included, provided the affected dermatomes are contiguous.
  • Patient is ≥18 years of age, with a body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 34 kg/m2, inclusive, at the screening visit.
  • If the patient is a woman and is fertile, the patient is not pregnant and has negative pregnancy tests at both the screening and randomization visits, and agrees to use an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of the study, including follow-up.
  • If the patient is a man and is capable of producing offspring, the patient must agree to use an acceptable method of contraception, unless the partner cannot become pregnant for the duration of the study, including follow-up.
  • Patient must sign the written Informed Consent Form (ICF) for the study and be willing to comply with all study procedures and restrictions.
  • Patient must be judged by the investigator to be medically healthy (except for PHN) and able to participate in the study
  • Other criteria apply, please contact the investigator for more information

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient has any other severe pain that might confound assessment or self-evaluation of pain due to PHN.
  • Patient has PHN affecting the face (trigeminal nerve distribution).
  • Patient has a history, in the judgment of the investigator, of inadequate response to more than 3 adequate courses of treatment with other medications used to treat neuropathic pain (eg, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, anticonvulsants, topical lidocaine, and/or topical capsaicin).
  • Patient is taking oral analgesics (either opioid or non-opioid) or is receiving topical therapy such as the 5% topical lidocaine patch for the treatment of pain and is unwilling or unable to complete a washout period during which the patient will discontinue analgesic therapy or topical pain therapy.
  • Patient has been treated with topical capsaicin at any time in the past 6 months for neuropathic pain.
  • Patient has a history of fibromyalgia.
  • Other criteria apply, please contact the investigator for more information
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02365636). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search