Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=21 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Onabotulinumtoxin A Versus Kenalog for Chronic Pelvic Pain

Pelvic Pain

Enrolled (actual)
21
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Pain Assessed by Change in Overall Pain Score Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). — -2; -1 units on a scale — p=0.072

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Onabotulinumtoxin A (Drug); Kenalog (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Jamie Bartley, DO
Primary completion
Mar 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Pain Assessed by Change in Overall Pain Score Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
-2; -1 0.072
PRIMARY
Pain Severity Assessed by Change in Overall Pain and Other Related Scores Using Questions 3, 4, 5, and 6 in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Questionnaire.
0.0; -1.25
PRIMARY
Pain Interference Assessed by Change in Overall Pain and Other Related Scores Using Questions 9A Through 9G in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Questionnaire.
-0.71; -1.14
PRIMARY
Pain Assessed by Change in Overall Pain Symptom Using Question 2 of the Global Response Assessment (GRA) Questionnaire.
0; 0; 0; 0; 1; 1
SECONDARY
Pain Assessed by Change in Overall Pain Score Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Questionnaire.
-1; -1
SECONDARY
Pain Severity Assessed by Change in Overall Pain and Other Related Scores Using Questions 3, 4, 5, and 6 in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Questionnaire.
0.0; -1.25
SECONDARY
Pain Interference Assessed by Change in Overall Pain and Other Related Scores Using Questions 9A Through 9G in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Questionnaire.
-0.71; -1.14
SECONDARY
Pain Assessed by Change in Overall Pain Symptom Using Question 2 of the Global Response Assessment (GRA) Questionnaire.
0; 0; 0; 0; 1; 1
SECONDARY
Pain Assessed by Change in Overall Pain Score Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Questionnaire.
-1; -1
SECONDARY
Pain Severity Assessed by Change in Overall Pain and Other Related Scores Using Questions 3, 4, 5, and 6 in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Questionnaire.
0.0; -1.25
SECONDARY
Pain Interference Assessed by Change in Overall Pain and Other Related Scores Using Questions 9A Through 9G in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Questionnaire.
-0.71; -1.14
SECONDARY
Pain Assessed by Change in Overall Pain and Other Related Scores Using the Global Response Assessment (GRA) Questionnaire.
0; 0; 1; 0; 0; 0

Summary

The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two different medications used in intravaginal trigger point injections (injections into extremely painful areas of a muscle) to treat chronic pelvic pain. The study compares onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) (a drug prepared from the bacterial toxin botulin which temporarily paralyzes muscles) to Kenalog (a synthetic corticosteroid used as an anti-inflammatory agent).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Provide informed consent
  • Healthy women > age 18 regardless of menopausal status
  • Willing and able to fill out study questionnaires. In patients that are unable to read, the research nurse will be available to assist.
  • High-tone pelvic floor dysfunction on vaginal exam
  • A pelvic pain score of > 4 on screening Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
  • Pain perceived to be in the pelvis that has been present for at least 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients that have had Botox to the bladder within the last 8 months
  • Patients that have had Botox outside the bladder of > 160 u within the last 12 weeks.
  • Patients that have had transvaginal trigger point injections of any form (Botox or steroid) in the last 3 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Concomitant use of any narcotic drug, alcohol, or any illicit drug use during the study period that could be deemed unsafe in combination with study medication as judged by the investigators.
  • Any evidence of vaginitis on wet mount slide at initial visit that is untreated.
  • Subject with any other vaginal epithelial disorder that could affect absorption of medication as deemed by the investigators.
  • Any indication/condition/medication that the investigators identify as contraindicated in conjunction with study medication.
  • Systolic blood pressure > 160 mm Hg on screening blood pressure
  • Heart rate > 110 beats/minute on screening heart rate
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02369068). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search