Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=40 Randomized Single-blind Other

Assessment of the Transferability of Skills From Robotic to Laparoscopic Simulation Platforms

Surgical Simulation Education

Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Time to Task Completion (Robotic Task) — 120; 71 seconds

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
a laparoscopic simulator (Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS), VT Medical Inc, Waltham, MA) (Device); Mimic da Vinci robotic simulator (Device)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Primary completion
Dec 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Time to Task Completion (Robotic Task)
120; 71
PRIMARY
Global Rating Scale Score on the Laparoscopic Task
22.5; 16.3
PRIMARY
Global Rating Scale Score on the Robotic Task
16.9; 23.5
PRIMARY
Time to Task Completion on the Laparoscopic Task
100; 158
SECONDARY
Economy of Motion on the Robotic Task
241; 161
SECONDARY
Instrument Out of View
3.06; 0.91
SECONDARY
Instrument Collisions
2.8; 1.1
SECONDARY
Time Spent Using Excessive Force
0.28; 0.24
SECONDARY
Workspace Range
9.41; 9.34

Summary

This is a randomized controlled trial that will randomize 40 surgical skill naive medical students to practice on a robotic simulator or laparoscopic simulator after first completing a baseline evaluation on both surgical simulation platforms. Medical students will be evaluated again after 10 practice sessions on the laparoscopic or robotic platforms to assess transferability of skills between the surgical simulation platforms.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Medical students with no prior laparoscopic or robotic experience in clinical or practice setting

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prior laparoscopic or robotic experience in clinical setting or in practice setting
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02370407). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search