Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=20

Clinical Comparison of Electrocardiograms Collected Using an Ambulatory Holter

Electrocardiography
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02383667 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
20
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Arrythmia — 4.6; 7.95 Quality rating

Summary

The objective of the study is to compare electrocardiograms using ambulatory holter monitor with dry electrodes in a harness versus using an ambulatory holter with standard sticky electrodes (Red Dot) on monitored patients within the hospital. Patients will be simultaneously be hooked up to two ambulatory Holter monitors for the period of time to be not less than one hour. One holter will use standard electrodes in a standard electrode distribution. The second holter will use dry electrodes in a derived.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Arrythmia
4.6; 7.95

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Any patient within the hospital either for procedure or for admission

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who cannot wear a Holter monitor
  • Patients undergoing an MRI or have other contraindications for wearing an ambulatory Holter monitor.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02383667). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search