Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=157 Randomized Diagnostic

i-Scan for the Detection of Helicobacter Pylori

Gastritis

Enrolled (actual)
157
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Successful Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori Using Imaging Modality — 28; 125 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
i-scan (Device); narrow band imaging (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Imperial College London
Primary completion
Oct 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Successful Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori Using Imaging Modality
28; 125

Summary

This study aims to assess whether iScan, an intra-endoscopic imaging technique is an accurate and reliable tool in detecting and characterising Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) and comparing this to standard endoscopic imaging with white light endoscopy (WLE), narrow band imaging (NBI) and histology.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All patients attending for a routine diagnostic endoscopic procedure at St Mary's Hospital NHS Trust for dyspepsia and abdominal pain

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients attending for a therapeutic endoscopic procedure e.g. variceal banding, stent insertion, balloon dilatation.
  • Patients with a known diagnosis e.g. upper gastrointestinal cancer
  • Patients previously treated with HP eradication therapy
  • Patients who had taken PPI, H2 receptor antagonists and antibiotics within 4 weeks
  • Patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Patients who'd had previous gastric surgery
  • Patients with chronic liver disease
  • Patients with abnormal coagulation or any other contra-indication to use of standard biopsy in routine diagnostic endoscopic procedures
  • Patients who are unable or unwilling to give informed consent
  • Patients under the age of 18 years
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02385045). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search