Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=54 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Japanese Phase 3 Study of Aflibercept in Neovascular Glaucoma Patients

Glaucoma, Neovascular

Enrolled (actual)
54
Serious AEs
5.6%
Results posted
Jul 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline to Pre-dose at Week 1 — -8.5; -4.9 mmHg — p=0.0644

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Aflibercept (Eylea, BAY 86-5321) (Drug); Sham Injection (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 20+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Bayer
Primary completion
Jun 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline to Pre-dose at Week 1
-8.5; -4.9 0.0644
SECONDARY
Percentage of Subjects Who Had Improved Neovascularization of the Iris (NVI) Grade From Baseline to Pre-dose at Week 1
70.4; 11.5

Summary

To assess the efficacy and safety of the administration of aflibercept by intravitreal injection in comparison to sham to control intraocular pressure in patients with neovascular glaucoma.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Japanese men and women aged 20 years or older,
  • Patients diagnosed as having Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) with neovascularization in the anterior segment (both iris and anterior chamber angle),
  • Patients with Intraocular pressure (IOP) higher than 25 mmHg in the study eye due to anterior segment (both iris and anterior chamber angle) neovascularization.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with angle-closure due to conditions other than Neovascular glaucoma
  • Patients with a known or suspected ocular or peri-ocular infection,
  • Patients with severe intraocular inflammation in the study eye,
  • Women who are pregnant, suspected of being pregnant or lactating,
  • Patients with known allergy to aflibercept.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02396316). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search