N/A
N=32
Simulation-based Training for Flexible Cystoscopy - a Patient Transfer Randomized Trial
Education
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02411747 ↗Enrolled (actual)
32
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Global Rating Scale — 13.6; 13.4 units on a scale — p=0.34
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Testing (Behavioral); Directed self-regulated simulation training (Behavioral)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Primary completion
- Jun 2015
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Global Rating Scale |
13.6; 13.4 | 0.34 |
Summary
Simulation training in surgical education in Urology specialist training in flexible cystoscopy has been demonstrated a valid and efficient learning instrument. The classical setup with a medical expert introducing the novices to the theoretical background and technics of the procedure is time-consuming and expensive. Directed self-regulated simulation training (DSR) is a validated method in simulation training. The power of testing in DSR and flexible cystoscopy is to our knowledge not known. We introduced a setup in which the novices started by training in a directed self-regulated simulation training environment and informed them that they would be tested by a medical expert afterwards. The intervention group novices were given only written theoretical information and anatomical pictures. The control group were first given a classical oral theoretical introduction by a medical expert and secondly did DSR training. We tested the outcome of the intervention by a validated rating scale for flexible cystoscopy. The novices in both the control and intervention group were tested on patients prescribed a flexible cystoscopy and evaluated by a specialist in Urology.
The main hypothesis was that testing in relation to DSR would result in higher scores on a validated scale when performing a flexible cystoscopy on a patient evaluated by a specialist in Urology compared to a group having a oral lecture before DSR.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Senior medical students
- Novices in endoscopic procedures
- Written and oral consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Performed a endoscopic procedure independently
- Lack of language skills
- Lack of written and oral consent
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02411747). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.