Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=25 Randomized Health Services Research

Comparison of the Airway Clearance Efficacy of Electro Flo 5000 and the G5 Flimm-Fighter in Patients With CF

Cystic Fibrosis

Enrolled (actual)
25
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Wet Sputum Weight — 5.22; 4.19 gram

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Electro-Flo Intervention (Device); G5 Intervention (Device)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 8+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Stanford University
Primary completion
Jun 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Wet Sputum Weight
5.22; 4.19
PRIMARY
Dry Sputum Weight
0.21; 0.15
PRIMARY
Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted AFTER Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / G5.
71.36; 71.52
SECONDARY
Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted BEFORE Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / G5.
69.16; 69.84
SECONDARY
PRO (Patient-reported Outcome)
3.24; 3.2

Summary

It is the goal of the proposed study to compare the efficacy, as assessed primarily by sputum weight, of these two different devices (the Electroflo 500 and the G5 Flimm-Fighter) for airway clearance (AC) in CF patients with mild to moderate lung disease, who have stable lung health and perform AC at home as part of their routine therapeutic regimen.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of CF established by standard criteria (sweat chloride > 60 mmol/L and/or two alleles affected by gene mutations know to be associated with CF).
  • Age older than 8 years.
  • Known to consistently produce sputum.
  • Currently on a home therapeutic regimen that includes some form of AC performed at least 1 time daily.
  • FEV1 > 30%-predicted, and with stable lung function

Exclusion Criteria

  • Hospitalization for CF pulmonary complications in the 1 months preceding enrollment.
  • Hemoptysis > 60 cc in a single episode in the 4 weeks preceding enrollment.
  • Chronic chest pain.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial in the previous 30 days.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02423447). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search