Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=45 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Comparison of Intratechal Levobupivacaine and Adding With Sufetanil and Fentanyl in Ceserean Section

Anesthesia

Enrolled (actual)
45
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability — 5; 10; 9 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Levobupivacaine (Drug); Fentanyl (Drug); Sufentanil (Drug)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Primary completion
Mar 2007

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
5; 10; 9
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale

Summary

45 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section were enrolled in the study in november 2006 to march 2007. 2 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine was added to 1 ml of saline in group I, 1 ml of 15 µcg of fentanyl in group II and 1 ml of 1,5 µcg sufentanil in group III by intratechal administration. Hemodynamic parameters, characteristics of sensory and motor blockade, peri-operative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, the time to the first analgesic requirement and adverse effects were recorded.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • pregnant women with a single live fetus aged 18-45 years old and classified as ASA I, undergoing elective cesarean section, were included the study in november 2006 to march 2007

Exclusion Criteria

  • Multiple pregnancies,
  • preterm labor,
  • eclampsia,
  • preeclampsia,
  • concomitant diabetes mellitus,
  • allergy to local anesthetics, fentanyl or sufentanil,
  • contraindication for regional anesthesia were the exclusion criteria.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02430090). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search