Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 Completed N=53 Treatment

Phase 1/2 Study of Motolimod, Doxorubicin, and Durvalumab in Recurrent, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02431559 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
53
Serious AEs
49.1%
Results posted
Sep 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) — 3; 4; 6; 40 Participants

Summary

This is an ongoing Phase 1/2, open-label, multicenter, non-randomized study of MEDI4736 (durvalumab) in subjects with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who are scheduled to receive pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD).The primary objective of Phase 1 is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile, with a secondary objective to evaluate the clinical efficacy as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months (PFS-6). The primary objective of Phase 2 is the evaluation of clinical efficacy as measured by PFS-6. For both phases, secondary objectives include evaluation of clinical efficacy as measured by overall response rate, PFS, and overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability, and immunological responses.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
3; 4; 6; 40; 3; 4
PRIMARY
Progression-free Survival Rate at 6 Months (PFS-6) by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method
33.3; 50.0; 33.3; 42.9
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor Response by RECIST 1.1
0; 0; 0; 4; 1; 1
SECONDARY
Median PFS by RECIST 1.1 as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method
5.6; 5.7; 4.3; 5.5
SECONDARY
PFS-12 by RECIST 1.1 as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method
33.3; 25.0; 16.7; 29.5
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor Response by the Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)
0; 0; 0; 4; 1; 1
SECONDARY
PFS-6 by irRECIST as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method
33.3; 50.0; 33.3; 42.6
SECONDARY
PFS-12 by irRECIST as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method
33.3; 25.0; 16.7; 33.4
SECONDARY
Median PFS by irRECIST as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method
5.6; 5.7; 4.3; 5.5
SECONDARY
Median Overall Survival (OS) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method
27.7; NA; 12.8; 17.6

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects must have had recurrent or persistent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma with measurable disease (as defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1.) after first or second line platinum-based chemotherapy, for which treatment with PLD was indicated. Platinum-based therapy was defined as treatment with carboplatin, cisplatin or another organoplatinum compound. Platinum-resistant was defined as having a platinum-free interval of 30 kg.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prior exposure to doxorubicin, PLD or any other anthracycline, motolimod and other toll-like receptor agonists, durvalumab or checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibodies.
  • Subjects with platinum-refractory disease, defined as disease progression while receiving first line platinum-based therapy.
  • Clinically significant persistent immune-related adverse events following prior therapy.
  • Subjects with history or evidence upon physical examination of central nervous system disease, including primary brain tumor, seizures not controlled with standard medical therapy, any brain metastases, or, within 6 months prior to Day 1 of this study, history of cerebrovascular accident (stroke), transient ischemic attack or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
  • Subjects with clinically significant cardiovascular disease. This included:
  • Resistant hypertension.
  • Myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months prior to Day 1 of the study.
  • History of serious ventricular arrhythmia (i.e., ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) or cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic medications, except for atrial fibrillation that is well controlled with anti-arrhythmic medication.
  • Baseline ejection fraction ≤ 50% as assessed by echocardiogram or multiple-gated acquisition.
  • New York Heart Association Class II or higher congestive heart failure.
  • Grade 2 or higher peripheral ischemia, except for brief ( 1 year ago, had chemotherapy-induced menopause with last menses > 1 year ago, or underwent surgical sterilization (bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral salpingectomy or hysterectomy).

A highly effective method of contraception was defined as one that results in a low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly. Note that some contraception methods were not considered highly effective (e.g., male or female condom with or without spermicide; female cap, diaphragm, or sponge with or without spermicide; non-copper containing intrauterine device; progestogen-only oral hormonal contraceptive pills where inhibition of ovulation is not the primary mode of action [excluding Cerazette/desogestrel which is considered highly effective]; and triphasic combined oral contraceptive pills).

  • Any condition that, in the clinical judgment of the treating physician, was likely to prevent the subject from complying with any aspect of the protocol or that may have put the subject at unacceptable risk.
  • Subjects must not have donated blood while on study and for at least 90 days following the last durvalumab treatment.
  • History of allogeneic organ transplant.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02431559). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search