N/A N=39 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Esthetic Outcomes of Single Immediate Implant Placement

Gingival Recession · Bone Loss, Alveolar

Bottom Line

View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02435706 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

May 2019

Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Gingival Margin Location on the Buccal, Mesial and Distal Compared With Pre-operative Baseline and Post-operative Baseline — .11; .43; .28; .48 mm

Study Design & Population

Study type: Interventional
Phase: N/A
Interventions: Flapless immediate implant placement (Procedure); Flap assisted immediate implant placement (Procedure); Implant and temporary crown (Device)
Age: Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex: All
Sponsor: Columbia University
Primary completion: Aug 2016

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Change in Gingival Margin Location on the Buccal, Mesial and Distal Compared With Pre-operative Baseline and Post-operative Baseline	.11; .43; .28; .48; .11; .48	—
SECONDARY Change in Buccal Horizontal Ridge Dimensions	.64; .54; .18; .19; .58; .80	—
SECONDARY Change in Interproximal Crestal Bone Levels	.31; .37; .45; .82; .47; .73	—

Summary

A randomized controlled trial of 12-month duration to compare gingival margin location, buccal horizontal ridge dimensions, and interproximal crestal bone levels following two surgical approaches for immediate placement of implants in the esthetic zone: one involving flap elevation and another using a flapless protocol.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Single non-restorable tooth in the anterior maxilla
Intact buccal plate or 10 cigarettes/day
Parafunctional habits
Malocclusion or intent of orthodontic therapy in the future
Severe periodontal disease

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02435706). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.