Phase 3
N=522
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of AVP-786 for the Treatment of Agitation in Participants With Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type
Agitation in Participants With Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02442778 ↗Enrolled (actual)
522
Serious AEs
6.3%
Results posted
Sep 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score — 73.7; 68.8; 71.3; -16.2 score on a scale — p=0.789
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Interventions
- AVP-786-18 (Drug); Placebo (Drug); AVP-786-28 (Drug); AVP-786-42.63 (Drug)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
- Primary completion
- Aug 2019
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score |
73.7; 68.8; 71.3; -16.2; -12.7; -17.0 | 0.789 |
| SECONDARY Relative Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Modified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (mADCS-CGIC)-Agitation Score |
2.9; 3.1; 2.8 | 0.484 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Agitation/Aggression Domain Score |
-2.5; -2.3; -3.2 | 0.416 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the NPI Agitation/Aggression Caregiver Distress Score |
-0.8; -0.8; -0.8 | 0.249 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the NPI Aberrant Motor Behavior Domain Score |
-1.2; -1.2; -1.8 | 0.975 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Score |
-1.77; -1.03; -0.23 | 0.934 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the NPI Irritability/Lability Domain Score |
-1.8; -1.2; -2.2 | 0.888 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the NPI Total Score |
-12.3; -9.5; -16.9 | 0.756 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGIS)-Agitation Domain Score |
-0.7; -0.7; -0.8 | 0.468 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) Overall Rating |
3.2; 3.4; 3.1 | 0.400 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score |
3.1; 3.1; 2.9 | 0.751 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Dementia Quality of Life (DEMQOL) Score |
2.9; 3.8; 3.2 | 0.782 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) Score |
-1.1; -0.5; -1.5 | 0.038 sig |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With the Change From Baseline in the General Medical Health Rating (GMHR) Score at Week 12 |
6; 6; 3; 22; 7; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score |
-2.0; -1.0; -1.5 | 0.236 |
| SECONDARY Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) Score: Number of Hours Per Day the Caregiver Spent Assisting the Participant |
3.0; 3.0; 3.0; 4.5; 5.0; 5.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) Score: Number of Days the Caregiver Spent Assisting the Participant |
30.0; 30.0; 30.0; 30.0; 30.0; 30.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) Score: Number of Visits to Hospital, Emergency, and Healthcare Professional |
1.0; 1.3; 1.3; 1.0; 1.0; 2.7 | — |
Summary
Participants with agitation secondary to dementia of the Alzheimer's type. The diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) will be based on the "2011 Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer's Disease" issued by the National Institute on Aging (NIA)-Alzheimer's Association (AA) workgroups.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's Disease (AD) according to the 2011 National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) working groups criteria
- The participant has clinically significant, moderate/severe agitation at the time of screening and for at least 2 weeks prior to randomization
- The diagnosis of agitation must meet the International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) provisional definition of agitation
- Either out participants or residents of an assisted-living facility or a skilled nursing home
- Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGIS) score assessing Agitation is >=4 (moderately ill) at screening and baseline
- Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score is between 6 and 26 (inclusive) at screening and baseline
- Caregiver who is able and willing to comply with all required study procedures. In order to qualify as a reliable informant (i.e., caregiver) capable of assessing changes in participant's condition during the study, the individual must spend a minimum of 2 hours per day for 4 days per week with the participant.
Exclusion Criteria
- Participant has dementia predominantly of non-Alzheimer's type (e.g., vascular dementia, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease, substance-induced dementia)
- Participants with co-existent clinically significant or unstable systemic diseases that could confound the interpretation of the safety results of the study (e.g., malignancy, poorly controlled diabetes, poorly controlled hypertension, unstable pulmonary, renal or hepatic disease, unstable ischemic cardiac disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, or unstable valvular heart disease)
- Participant with myasthenia gravis
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02442778). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.