Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=1,025 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Efficacy and Safety Study of RAGWITEK™ (MK-3641) in Children With Ragweed-Induced Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without Asthma (MK-3641-008)

Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02478398 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
1,025
Serious AEs
1.6%
Results posted
Jul 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Peak Ragweed Season (RS) — 4.39; 7.12 Score on a scale — p=< 0.001
◆ Published Evidence
Established
55citations · ~9 / year
Efficacy and Safety of Ragweed SLIT-Tablet in Children with Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2020 · Likely link

Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of short ragweed pollen allergen extract (MK-3641, SCH 039641, RAGWITEK™) sublingual immunotherapy tablets in children aged 5 to 17 years with ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma. The primary hypothesis of this study is that administration of short ragweed pollen allergen extract sublingual immunotherapy tablets to children 5 to 17 years of age, compared with placebo, will result in a significant reduction in the combination of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use over the peak ragweed season (RS).

Linked Publications (4)

  • Efficacy and Safety of Ragweed SLIT-Tablet in Children with Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
    The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2020 · 55 citations · Likely link
  • Sublingual immunotherapy for asthma.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020 · 52 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Sublingual Versus Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: What Are the Important Therapeutic and Real-World Considerations?
    Current allergy and asthma reports · 2020 · 21 citations · Likely link
  • Randomized controlled trial of ragweed sublingual immunotherapy tablet in the subpopulation of Canadian children and adolescents with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
    Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021 · 3 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Peak Ragweed Season (RS)
4.39; 7.12 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Average TCS During the Entire RS
3.88; 5.75 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DSS During the Peak RS
2.55; 3.95 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Average Rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) DMS During the Peak RS
2.01; 3.85 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Reporting Pre-specified Local Application Site Reactions
64.52; 26.92 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Reporting Anaphylaxis and/or Systemic Allergic Reactions
0.58; 0.20 = 0.320
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Treated With Epinephrine
0.19; 0.20 = 0.996

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Is between the ages of 4 and 17 years (inclusive) at enrollment in this study and is at least 5 years old at randomization
  • Has a clinical history of significant ragweed pollen-induced allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis of ≥1 year (at least 1 season for ages 4 to 6 years) or ≥2 years (at least 2 seasons for ages 7 to 17 years) duration diagnosed by a physician (with or without asthma) and have received treatment for the condition during the previous ragweed season
  • If female, agrees to remain abstinent or use (or have their partner use) an acceptable method of birth control within the projected duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Has a clinical history of symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis (and/or asthma) due to another allergen, which has required regular medication during, or potentially overlapping, the ragweed season
  • Has a clinical history of significant symptomatic perennial allergic rhinitis and/or asthma due to an allergen to which the subject is regularly exposed during the ragweed season which would interfere with assessment of the treatment effect
  • Has any nasal condition that could confound the efficacy or safety assessments (e.g., nasal polyposis).
  • Has asthma requiring high daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids within the 6 months prior to the Screening visit
  • Is either >7 years old and cannot perform reproducible FEV1 maneuvers despite coaching; OR is ≤7 years old and cannot perform reproducible FEV1 maneuvers despite coaching and has current symptoms of asthma characterized by recurrent episodes of wheezing, or episodes of cough, wheeze, difficulty in breathing, or chest tightness
  • Has severe, unstable, or uncontrolled asthma, as judged by the clinical investigator, or has experienced a life-threatening asthma attack or an occurrence of any clinical deterioration of asthma that resulted in emergency treatment, hospitalization due to asthma, or treatment with systemic corticosteroids (but allowing short-acting beta agonists) at any time within the last 3 months prior to the Screening or Randomization visits
  • Has a history of anaphylaxis with cardiorespiratory symptoms with prior immunotherapy, unknown cause, or inhalant allergen
  • Has a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis
  • Has a history of chronic urticaria and/or chronic angioedema
  • Has a clinical history of chronic sinusitis during the 2 years prior to the Screening or Randomization visits
  • Has current severe atopic dermatitis
  • Has a history of allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to the ingredients of the study drug (except for Ambrosia artemisiifolia), rescue medications, or self-injectable epinephrine
  • Has previously received short ragweed pollen allergen extract
  • Has previously been randomized into this study
  • Is participating in any other clinical study or plans to participate in another clinical study during the duration of this study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02478398) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search