Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=388 Randomized Double-blind Other

Efficiency of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope

Respiratory Failure · Intubation

Enrolled (actual)
388
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Intubation Success Rate — 22; 13; 366; 375 participants — p=0.119

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Macintosh laryngoscope (Device); King Vision video laryngoscope (Device)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University
Primary completion
Jul 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Intubation Success Rate
22; 13; 366; 375 0.119
SECONDARY
Intubation Time
6.6; 10.8 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Glottic View Time
7.3; 7.9 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Cormack-Lehane Score
149; 357; 139; 31; 93; 0 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Airway Complications
384; 382; 4; 6 0.75

Summary

The investigators studied the efficiency of Macintosh laryngoscope and the King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients scheduled for general anesthesia. Best Cormack-Lehane score obtained, glottic view time, intubation time, time to ventilation, correlation between the Mallampati classification and the Cormack-Lehane grades, and complications related to laryngoscopy and intubation has been investigated.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • scheduled for general anesthesia
  • age higher than 18 years
  • age lower than 60 years

Exclusion Criteria

  • emergency surgery
  • mouth opening less than 2 cm
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score higher than 2
  • oropharyngeal anomaly
  • glottic or supraglottic mass
  • history of surgery due to oropharyngeal anomaly, glottic or supraglottic mass
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02482870). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search