Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=122 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

The Effect of Priming of Questionnaire Content on Grip Strength in Patients With Hand and Upper Extremity Illness

Hand and Upper Extremity Illness

Enrolled (actual)
122
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) — 8.2 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Standard PCS (Other); Grip Strength (Other); Positively Adjusted PCS (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Primary completion
Aug 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
8.2
PRIMARY
Positive Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
36.4
PRIMARY
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
0.71; 3.1; -1.2; 2.7
PRIMARY
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
0.71; 3.1; -1.2; 2.7
PRIMARY
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
0.71; 3.1; -1.2; 2.7

Summary

Objectives: To determine the association between priming and measurements of hand function such as grip strength Primary null hypothesis: There is no difference in grip strength (best of three attempts) as a percent of the opposite hand between patients that complete the standard Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) compared to patients that complete the positively adjusted PCS. Secondary null hypotheses: There is no difference in grip strength (last of three attempts) as a percent of the opposite hand between patients that complete the standard PCS compared to patients that complete the positively adjusted PCS. There is no difference in grip strength (best of three attempts) before and after completing the questionnaires between patients that complete the standard PCS compared to patients that complete the positively adjusted PCS.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All English-speaking adult patients visiting the Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unable to complete enrollment forms due to mental status or language problem
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02493127). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search