Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=359 Randomized Treatment

Using Question Prompt Lists During Pediatric Asthma Visits to Increase Adolescent Involvement

Asthma

Enrolled (actual)
359
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants Achieving Asthma Control — 121; 128; 53; 36 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Educational Video and Question Prompt List (Behavioral)
Age
Pediatric · 11+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Primary completion
Nov 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants Achieving Asthma Control
121; 128; 53; 36
PRIMARY
Adolescent Asthma Management Self-efficacy Score
58.9; 59.7
PRIMARY
Asthma Quality-of-life Score
6.1; 6.2

Summary

The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial with English and Spanish-speaking adolescents to compare the effectiveness of an adolescent "asthma question prompt list" with a supportive educational video intervention with usual care. The hypothesis of this study is that by showing the parents and adolescents the educational video and then providing the adolescents with the one-page "asthma question prompt lists" to use during their visits will improve: (a) asthma control, (b) adolescent self-efficacy in managing asthma, and (c) adolescent quality-of-life.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • ages 11 to 17 years;
  • speak and read English or Spanish;
  • have persistent asthma;
  • are present for an acute or follow-up asthma visit or a well-child visit;
  • and have previously visited the clinic at least once for asthma.

Adolescents' parents will be eligible if they are at least 18 years of age, speak and read English or Spanish, and are the legal guardian of the adolescent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • present for gastrointestinal complaints or other non-asthma related acute illness.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02498834). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search