Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=5,824

Comparison of Outcomes Between Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Deglutition Disorders

Enrolled (actual)
5,824
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: Mortality Calculated From Outcome Section From DPC Database at 90 Days — 359; 287 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Parenteral nutrition (Device); Enteral nutrition (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 20+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Tokyo University
Primary completion
Mar 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mortality Calculated From Outcome Section From DPC Database at 90 Days
359; 287
SECONDARY
Post-procedural Pneumonia
346; 450
SECONDARY
Post-procedural Sepsis
129; 108
SECONDARY
Re-admission 30 Days
188; 159
SECONDARY
Mortality Calculated From Outcome Section From DPC Database at 14 Days
114; 89
SECONDARY
Mortality Calculated From Outcome Section From DPC Database at 30 Days
114; 89

Summary

Short-term outcomes of parenteral and enteral nutrition for patients unable to eat normally were compared and analyzed.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • investigators selected participants aged 20 years or older who had undergone either parenteral nutrition by central venous port insertion or enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, percutaneous transesophageal gastrotubing, or ileostomy between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2013. Patients who received both gastrostomy and central venous port insertion were assigned to the gastrostomy group.

Exclusion Criteria

  • investigators excluded participants who had been diagnosed with cancer.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02512224). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search