Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=229 Randomized Other

Study Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (CRT) for Spinal Metastases

Spinal Metastases

Enrolled (actual)
229
Serious AEs
3.1%
Results posted
Aug 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Phase III: Complete Pain Response at 3 Months Post-radiation — 16; 40; 29; 20 Participants — p=0.0002

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
20 Gy in 5 fractions (Radiation); Conventional SBRT: 24 Gy in 2 fractions (Radiation)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Canadian Cancer Trials Group
Primary completion
Jul 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Phase III: Complete Pain Response at 3 Months Post-radiation
16; 40; 29; 20; 34; 27 0.0002 sig
SECONDARY
Complete Pain Response at 6 Months Post Radiation Based on the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party Criteria
18; 37; 18; 10; 32; 26 0.0036 sig
SECONDARY
Radiation Site Progression-free Survival Rate at 6 Months Using MRI Imaging
0.69; 0.75 0.26
SECONDARY
Overall Survival Rate at 6 Months
0.73; 0.77 0.47

Summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if SBRT is better than CRT at controlling pain in the spine 3 months after receiving treatment.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of cancer (excluding seminoma, small cell lung cancer and hematologic primaries).
  • Spinal metastasis documented with MRI and suitable for treatment with radiotherapy with the following characteristics:
  • Painful, as defined by a pain score ≥ 2 for worst pain in the planned target treatment volume;
  • ≤ 3 consecutive spinal segments involved by tumour to be included in the planned target volume. The patient may have other spinal metaastases to be treated as per the radiation oncologist's discretion, but the eligible spinal metastatic site has to be one where there is pain and no more than 3 consecutive segments to be included as clinical target volume and appropriate for either 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 24 Gy in 2 fractions per the randomization.
  • There is no plan to change the pain medication on the first day of protocol treatment with radiotherapy.
  • ECOG Performance Status 0-2.
  • Seen by a radiation oncologist and judged to be appropriate for participation in this study including ability to tolerate protocol radiotherapy (SBRT or CRT).
  • Age of 18 years or older.
  • Patient is able and willing to complete the Patient Diary (pain and analgesic use).
  • Patient is able (i.e. sufficiently fluent) and willing to complete the quality of life questionnaire in either English or French. The baseline assessment must be completed within required timelines, prior to randomization. Inability (illiteracy in English or French, loss of sight, or other equivalent reason) to complete the questionnaires will not make the patient ineligible for the study. However, ability but unwillingness to complete the questionnaires will make the patient ineligible.
  • Patient consent must be appropriately obtained in accordance with applicable local and regulatory requirements. Each patient must sign a consent form prior to enrollment in the trial to document their willingness to participate.
  • Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Investigators must assure themselves the patients randomized on this trial will be available for complete documentation of the treatment, adverse events, and follow-up.
  • In accordance with CCTG policy, protocol treatment is to begin within 3 weeks of patient randomization. From the time of successful treatment planning, no more than 12 days can elapse before the first fraction of radiotherapy is delivered.
  • Women/men of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive method. A woman is considered to be of "childbearing potential" if she has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months. In addition to routine contraceptive methods, "effective contraception" also includes heterosexual celibacy and surgery intended to prevent pregnancy (or with a side-effect of pregnancy prevention) defined as a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or vasectomy/vasectomized partner. However, if at any point a previously celibate patient chooses to become heterosexually active during the time period for use of contraceptive measures outlined in the protocol, he/she is responsible for beginning contraceptive measures.
  • Women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test to determine eligibility as part of the Pre-Study Evaluation; this may include an ultrasound to rule-out pregnancy if a false-positive is suspected. For example, when beta-human chorionic gonadotropin is high and partner is vasectomized, it may be associated with tumour production of hCG, as seen with some cancers. Patient will be considered eligible if an ultrasound is negative for pregnancy.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who have a pacemaker, such that MRI cannot be performed or treatment cannot be delivered safely.
  • Patients with prior treatment with any radionuclide within 30 days prior to randomization.
  • Patients with prior radiation to the spinal segment intended to be treated with protocol radiotherapy such that t
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02512965). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search