Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=658 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Assessment of the Efficacy of POLYGYNAX® in the Empirical Treatment of Infectious Vaginitis

Vaginitis

Enrolled (actual)
658
Serious AEs
0.2%
Results posted
Jan 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Clinical Treatment Efficacy Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Treatment Visit — 275; 268; 27; 41 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
POLYGYNAX® (Drug); GYNODAKTARIN® (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Laboratoire Innotech International
Primary completion
Aug 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Clinical Treatment Efficacy Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Treatment Visit
275; 268; 27; 41
SECONDARY
Change in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the Diary
31.43; 29.54; 27.89; 27.03; 16.93; 17.17
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Change in Vaginal Discharge Assessed by the Investigator
1; 7; 19; 24; 280; 276
SECONDARY
Clinical Treatment Efficacy (Success/Failure) Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Study Visit
252; 250; 45; 53
SECONDARY
Investigator's Global Satisfaction
265; 252; 25; 40; 10; 15
SECONDARY
Patient's Global Satisfaction
239; 233; 50; 63; 3; 2

Summary

POLYGYNAX® is a broad spectrum combination of nystatin, neomycin and polymixin B indicated for the local treatment of vaginitis due to sensitive germs and treatment of non specific vaginitis of adults. POLYGYNAX® has been marketed in France since 1969. Nevertheless, despite the well established use of POLYGYNAX®, there is no clinical study supporting the interest of the combination of antifungal and antibiotics agents versus antifungal agent alone. The aim of this project is to demonstrate that POLYGYNAX® is more effective than miconazole in the treatment of women experiencing symptoms of infectious vaginitis.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient with an abnormal vaginal discharge associated with one (or more) functional vaginal complaints: vaginal burning and/or vaginal pain and/or vaginal irritation clinically evoking an infectious vaginitis:
  • bacterial vaginitis
  • non-specific vaginitis (atypical symptoms)
  • mixed vaginitis (i.e. suprainfected fungal vaginitis) and able to receive an empirical local treatment

Exclusion Criteria

  • Recurrent patient; i.e. a patient who has had at least 4 episodes of infectious vaginitis in the 12 months prior to inclusion
  • Vaginal infection justifying systemic therapy
  • History of atrophic vaginitis or suspected atrophic vaginitis at inclusion
  • Patient presenting with signs of genital herpes or signs of non-infectious vulvar pathology (vulvodynia, psoriasis, eczema, lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, contact dermatitis, candida intertrigo, vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN))
  • Patient with current Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) and/or patients with clinical suspicion of STI
  • Disease or concomitant treatment that could cause decreased immunity (i.e. diabetes mellitus, corticosteroids treatments)
  • Systemic anti-infective treatment (antibiotic, antifungal) within two weeks prior to inclusion
  • Patient menstruating or patient with menometrorrhagia due to hormonal imbalance at the time of inclusion
  • Pregnant or lactating women or delivery within last 1 month
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02515656). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search