Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=73 Randomized Double-blind Prevention

, "Mucosal Injury During Nasotracheal Intubation for Dental Procedures in Children-does the Tube Design Matter?"

Epistaxis

Enrolled (actual)
73
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Epistaxis — 11; 2 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Parker flex-tip nasotracheal tube (Device); Standard nasotracheal tube (Device)
Age
Pediatric · 3+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Nemours Children's Clinic
Primary completion
Aug 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Epistaxis
11; 2
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Nasotracheal Tube Impingement
6; 3
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Postoperative Epistaxis
1; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Postoperative Croup
0; 1
SECONDARY
Time to Discharge in Minutes
32.1; 30.4

Summary

Comparison is made between standard nasotracheal tubes and a specially designed nasotracheal tube during nasotracheal intubation in children undergoing general anesthesia for dental surgery.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • children between the ages of 3-11, ASA 1-3, presenting to Wolfson Children's Hospital (WCH) for dental procedures requiring general anesthesia with nasotracheal intubation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • ASA >3
  • known bleeding disorders
  • recent or ongoing treatment with blood-thinning medicines
  • frequent epistaxis
  • active URI/congestion/rhinorrhea
  • craniofacial abnormalities prohibiting NTI
  • known difficult airway
  • prior nasal surgery/trauma
  • allergies to any of the medicines used in this study.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02517294). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search