Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=87 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

IN Sub-Dissociative Ketamine vs IN Fentanyl

Bone Fracture

Enrolled (actual)
87
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Primary Outcome: Number of Participants With Minor Side Effects and Significant Adverse Events — 0; 0; 41; 25 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
ketamine (Drug); fentanyl (Drug); ibuprofen or acetaminophen (Drug)
Age
Pediatric · 4+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Primary completion
Nov 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Primary Outcome: Number of Participants With Minor Side Effects and Significant Adverse Events
0; 0; 41; 25; 2; 19
SECONDARY
Secondary Outcome: Total Dose of Opioid Pain Medication in Morphine Equivalents/kg/Hour
0.04; 0.05

Summary

This single center, randomized control, double blind trial will prospectively examine the feasibility of intranasal, sub-dissociative (IN) ketamine versus intranasal fentanyl for pain control in the pediatric emergency department setting. The investigators hypothesize that IN ketamine may provide a safe and effective alternative to IN fentanyl for children with suspected, isolated extremity fractures. Eighty children ages 3-17 years with a suspected, isolated extremity fracture that requires analgesia will be randomized to receive IN ketamine or IN fentanyl upon presentation to the emergency department and will be followed for 2 hours for efficacy and 6 hours for safety.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • single suspected, isolated extremity fracture that requires analgesia

Exclusion Criteria

  • GCS 70 kg
  • patients receiving opioid analgesia administered prior to arrival
  • multiply injured patients (injuries to multiple extremities)
  • aberrant nasal anatomy that precludes IN medications
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02521415). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search