Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=167 Randomized Single-blind Prevention

Bacterial Contamination: Iodine vs Saline Irrigation in Pediatric Spine Surgery

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02527512 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
167
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2021
Primary outcomePrimary: Culture Positivity — 14; 13; 63; 63 Participants
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked

No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.

Summary

This study will evaluate the safety of povidone-iodine irrigation in pediatric spinal patients by collecting pre- and post-operative safety labwork. Furthermore, the efficacy of povidone-iodine and normal saline irrigation at reducing bacterial contamination of the surgical wound will be measured by collecting cultures before and after irrigation.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Culture Positivity
14; 13; 63; 63; 12; 14
SECONDARY
Risk Groups
2; 3; 12; 10; 16; 16

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 3 to 18 years on day of surgery
  • diagnosis of spinal deformity
  • undergoing elective posterior spine multi-level instrumentation surgery

Exclusion Criteria

  • Documented renal failure
  • documented allergy to iodine or shellfish
  • previous spine fusion surgery
  • undergoing elective posterior spine single-level instrumentation surgery
  • undergoing anterior spine multi-level instrumentation surgery
  • current antibiotic use.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02527512). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search