Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=88 Randomized Health Services Research

Conducting Annual Asthma Reviews Using Telehealthcare: Comparison With Standard Care (Face-to-face Consultations)

Asthma

Enrolled (actual)
88
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Patient Experience: Overall Patient Experience Score (General Practice Assessment Questionnaire GPAQ Score) — 390.0; 400.0 score on a scale — p=0.510

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Telehealthcare (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Imperial College London
Primary completion
Jun 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Patient Experience: Overall Patient Experience Score (General Practice Assessment Questionnaire GPAQ Score)
390.0; 400.0 0.510
SECONDARY
Dropout Rate
11; 2 0.014 sig
SECONDARY
Average Consultation Length (Time)
20.0; 15.0 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Health Related Quality of Life Score (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ))
6.4; 6.4 0.589
SECONDARY
Asthma Control Test Score
24; 23 0.471
SECONDARY
Number of Exacerbations.
0; 0 0.264
SECONDARY
Future Preference
26; 38

Summary

The National Report of Asthma Deaths published in 2014 highlighted significant deficiencies in both primary and secondary care resulting in one of the highest mortality rates in Europe. A key recommendation in the report is the provision of an annual asthma review in primary care. Telehealthcare is an alternative means of service delivery incorporating the use of telephone and e-mail consultations which may improve access and quality of patient care. There is scant data on the role of teleheathcare in asthma care. This is a single-centre, primary care-based, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of telehealthcare to conduct the annual asthma review for adult patients with well-controlled asthma. This will be compared with standard care (face-to-face consultations). Telehealthcare will consist of a telephone consultation followed by an e-mail with an attached personalised asthma action plan and a link to a video demonstrating inhaler technique. Standard care will involve a face-to-face consultation in primary care. The two patient groups will be compared prospectively to determine whether there is a difference in the quality of care evaluated in terms of the patient experience/ satisfaction, health-related quality of life, asthma control and frequency of asthma exacerbations over a 6 month period after the asthma review. The data will be presented in the form of frequency tables, bar charts and pie charts. Non-parametric tests will be applied to determine whether there is a significant difference in the quality of care received.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients aged 18 and over, registered at Balham Park Surgery
  • Patients diagnosed with asthma (patients on the asthma register)
  • Patients with well-controlled asthma (ACT score 20 and over; no out of hours/ A&E attendances/ PO steroids/ hospital admissions since the last asthma review in primary care)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients aged less than 18
  • Patients with poorly controlled asthma (ACT score 19 or less; out of hours/ A&E attendance/ hospital admission/ PO steroids since last asthma review in primary care)
  • Patients with a mental health diagnosis
  • Patients without an up to date contact telephone number or with communication difficulties that would prevent or restrict their use of the technology.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02545998). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search