Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=162 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Effect of Modified Stylet Angulation on the Intubation With GlideScope®

cholecystitis · Stomach Cancer
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02547064 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
162
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Time to Intubation — 47.2; 31.0 sec

Summary

The GlideScope® videolaryngoscope usually visualize glottis better than the conventional laryngoscope. Under the visualization of glottis by GlideScope®, the insertion of endotracheal tube, however, is challenging. The goal of this study was to determine which of two stylet (70° vs 90°) was better, as determined by time to intubation.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Time to Intubation
47.2; 31.0
SECONDARY
Success Rate of Intubation
68; 79
SECONDARY
Difficulty of Intubation Measured Using Visual Analogue Scale
35; 22
SECONDARY
Number of Participants for Whom External Laryngeal Manipulation Was Necessary
14; 3
SECONDARY
Cormack-Lehan Grade
70; 68; 7; 9; 1; 2
SECONDARY
Mallampati Grade
36; 32; 25; 33; 10; 8
SECONDARY
Thyromental Distance
79.1; 78.5
SECONDARY
Postoperative Sore Throat Measured Using Visual Analogue Scale
16; 13; 10; 8
SECONDARY
Mean Blood Pressure
77; 78; 105; 108
SECONDARY
Heart Rate
73; 73; 93; 93
SECONDARY
Airway Injury
5; 0

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients requiring endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

  • Difficult airway
  • Rapid sequence induction
  • Recent sore throat
  • Fragile teeth
  • Contraindication for videolaryngoscope
  • Head and neck surgery
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02547064). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search