Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=35 Randomized Single-blind Prevention

Balance Recovery Training for Fall Prevention in Retirement Communities

Accidental Falls, Aged, Exercise Movement Techniques

Enrolled (actual)
35
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Maximum Torso Angle at 0.8 Mph — 18.8; 23.9; 20.5; 11.7 degrees

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Balance recovery training (Other); Tai Chi exercise (Other)
Age
Older Adult · 70+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Texas A&M University
Primary completion
May 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Maximum Torso Angle at 0.8 Mph
18.8; 23.9; 20.5; 11.7; 17.5; 13.1
PRIMARY
Maximum Torso Angle at 1.6 Mph
29.7; 28.4; 29.6; 21.7; 22.2; 23.0
SECONDARY
Reactive Balance Rating
4.3; 4.8; 6.3; 8.2; 6.1; 8.7
SECONDARY
Step Length at 0.8 Mph
.49; .51; .44; .52; .48; .51
SECONDARY
Timed-up-and-go Test
14.8; 12.9; 13.6; 12.1; 13.2; 11.8
SECONDARY
Unipedal Stance Time Test
4.0; 5.7; 6.0; 6.3; 5.3; 7.6
SECONDARY
Maximum Step Length Test
18.1; 20.5; 18.9; 21.0; 18.9; 22.5
SECONDARY
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale
76.2; 74.0; 79.3; 76.6; 78.1; 78.9
SECONDARY
Performance-oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)
23.4; 23.7; 24.9; 23.9; 24.1; 24.9
SECONDARY
Berg Balance Test
44.5; 47.3; 48.0; 48.2; 47.7; 49.7
SECONDARY
Step Length at 1.6 Mph
.61; .56; .56; .62; .58; .60

Summary

Falls are the leading cause of injuries and injury-related deaths among older adults over the age of 65 in the United States. To help reduce the number of these falls, there is growing interest in using reactive balance training to improve the reactive response to common perturbations (e.g., tripping and slipping). The goal of this study was to compare treadmill-based reactive balance training versus Tai Chi performed at, and among residents of, older adult senior housing. We hypothesized that participants randomized to reactive balance training (RBT) would show better performance on reactive balance tests compared to participants randomized to Tai Chi. We also hypothesized that participants randomized to Tai Chi would show better performance on clinical tests of balance and mobility compared to participants randomized to RBT. The long-term goal of this work is to demonstrate the value of RBT over Tai Chi for preventing falls resulting from sudden, external perturbations. Thirty-five residents of five senior housing facilities were allocated to either treadmill-based reactive balance training or Tai Chi training. Both interventions were performed three times per week for four weeks, with each session lasting approximately 30 minutes. A battery of balance tests was performed at baseline, and again one week, one month, three months, and six months post-training. The battery included six standard clinical tests of balance and mobility, and a test of reactive balance performance.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Must be age 70 or older
  • Must be a resident of local continuing care retirement community (CCRC)
  • Must be able to walk down a long hallway without any aids (cane, walker, etc.)
  • Must not have a fragility fracture in the past 10 years
  • Must not smoke
  • Must not be in physical therapy
  • Must not perform more than 150 minutes/week of moderate to vigorous aerobic activity
  • Must score 24 or higher on Folstein Mini Mental Status Exam
  • Must have less than 20% probability of major osteoporotic fracture as assessed by the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score
  • Must not have recently (within 1 year) participated in Tai Chi
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02551666). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search