N/A
N=35
Balance Recovery Training for Fall Prevention in Retirement Communities
Accidental Falls, Aged, Exercise Movement Techniques
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02551666 ↗Enrolled (actual)
35
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Maximum Torso Angle at 0.8 Mph — 18.8; 23.9; 20.5; 11.7 degrees
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Balance recovery training (Other); Tai Chi exercise (Other)
- Age
- Older Adult · 70+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Texas A&M University
- Primary completion
- May 2017
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Maximum Torso Angle at 0.8 Mph |
18.8; 23.9; 20.5; 11.7; 17.5; 13.1 | — |
| PRIMARY Maximum Torso Angle at 1.6 Mph |
29.7; 28.4; 29.6; 21.7; 22.2; 23.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Reactive Balance Rating |
4.3; 4.8; 6.3; 8.2; 6.1; 8.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Step Length at 0.8 Mph |
.49; .51; .44; .52; .48; .51 | — |
| SECONDARY Timed-up-and-go Test |
14.8; 12.9; 13.6; 12.1; 13.2; 11.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Unipedal Stance Time Test |
4.0; 5.7; 6.0; 6.3; 5.3; 7.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Maximum Step Length Test |
18.1; 20.5; 18.9; 21.0; 18.9; 22.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale |
76.2; 74.0; 79.3; 76.6; 78.1; 78.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Performance-oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) |
23.4; 23.7; 24.9; 23.9; 24.1; 24.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Berg Balance Test |
44.5; 47.3; 48.0; 48.2; 47.7; 49.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Step Length at 1.6 Mph |
.61; .56; .56; .62; .58; .60 | — |
Summary
Falls are the leading cause of injuries and injury-related deaths among older adults over the age of 65 in the United States. To help reduce the number of these falls, there is growing interest in using reactive balance training to improve the reactive response to common perturbations (e.g., tripping and slipping). The goal of this study was to compare treadmill-based reactive balance training versus Tai Chi performed at, and among residents of, older adult senior housing. We hypothesized that participants randomized to reactive balance training (RBT) would show better performance on reactive balance tests compared to participants randomized to Tai Chi. We also hypothesized that participants randomized to Tai Chi would show better performance on clinical tests of balance and mobility compared to participants randomized to RBT. The long-term goal of this work is to demonstrate the value of RBT over Tai Chi for preventing falls resulting from sudden, external perturbations.
Thirty-five residents of five senior housing facilities were allocated to either treadmill-based reactive balance training or Tai Chi training. Both interventions were performed three times per week for four weeks, with each session lasting approximately 30 minutes. A battery of balance tests was performed at baseline, and again one week, one month, three months, and six months post-training. The battery included six standard clinical tests of balance and mobility, and a test of reactive balance performance.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Must be age 70 or older
- Must be a resident of local continuing care retirement community (CCRC)
- Must be able to walk down a long hallway without any aids (cane, walker, etc.)
- Must not have a fragility fracture in the past 10 years
- Must not smoke
- Must not be in physical therapy
- Must not perform more than 150 minutes/week of moderate to vigorous aerobic activity
- Must score 24 or higher on Folstein Mini Mental Status Exam
- Must have less than 20% probability of major osteoporotic fracture as assessed by the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score
- Must not have recently (within 1 year) participated in Tai Chi
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02551666). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.