Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=184 Randomized Other

Impact of Anticipated Regret Incorporation Into Patient Decision Aids

Regret
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02563808 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
184
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Difference in Consideration of Regret — 62; 69 participants reported regret played role

Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of incorporating "anticipated regret " into standard patient decision aids. Participants in the Wharton Behavioral Lab will be administered a standard patient decision aid and an "anticipated regret" augmented decision aid. Participants will complete a computerized survey about their experiences with each version, and their answers will be assessed for potential differences associated with the incorporation of "Anticipated Regret."

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Difference in Consideration of Regret
62; 69 —

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Healthy females ages 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria

  • Under age 18 years
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02563808). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search