N/A
Completed N=129
Contacting Authors to Retrieve Individual Patient Data
Response Rates
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02569411 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
129
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Jul 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Proportion of Authors Who Provided Complete IPD — 0; 0 Participants
Summary
The objective of this study is to examine the impact of incentivizing authors of RCTs that are eligible for a systematic review and meta-analysis, versus usual contact strategies to obtain original IPD
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Proportion of Authors Who Provided Complete IPD |
0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Time Taken to Obtain the IPD Between Initial Request and Authors' Provision |
— | — |
| SECONDARY The Completeness of the IPD Received |
— | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Corresponding authors of RCTs included in our previous and updated systematic reviews
Exclusion Criteria
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02569411). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.