Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=19 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Non-Damaging Photothermal Therapy of Non-exudative Age Related Macular Degeneration

Macular Degeneration · Retinal Drusen

Enrolled (actual)
19
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Macular Drusen Volume — 0.05; 0.11; 20.0; 9.0 mm^3

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Pascal Retinal Laser Photocoagulator (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 60+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Stanford University
Primary completion
Feb 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Macular Drusen Volume
0.05; 0.11; 20.0; 9.0; 42.2; 27.2
SECONDARY
Change in Visual Acuity
81.7; 79.4; -0.7; -3.4; -2.7; -0.9
SECONDARY
Development of Geographic Atrophy (GA) or Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV)
0; 0

Summary

This is a randomized controlled study of non-damaging photothermal macular grid laser versus sham laser therapy in patients with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and large high-risk drusen. The goal of the study is to determine if this treatment will reduce macular drusen volume and also whether this might improve visual acuity or reduce the risk of conversion to advanced age-related macular degeneration defined as development of choroidal neovascularization or geographic atrophy.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Older than 60 years of age.
  • Male or female patients with nonexudative AMD with a drusen volume of of at least 0.03mm3 in the central 3mm circle
  • Adequate pupil dilatation and clear media to perform colour, red-free imaging and fundus fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluorescence imaging and OCT.
  • Able to give an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Presence of signs of advanced AMD, such as CNV, haemorrhages or macular atrophy based on OCT and fundus autofluorescence photography (FAF).
  • Previous macular laser treatment.
  • Any previous ocular condition that may be associated with a risk of developing macular oedema.
  • Vitreomacular traction determined clinically and /or by OCT, which in the opinion of the investigator, contributes to the macular oedema (associated or causing a detachment of the fovea).
  • Presence of other macular disease such as epiretinal membrane, macular telangiectasia.
  • Important known allergies to sodium fluorescein dye used in angiography.
  • Ocular or periocular infections.
  • Planned intra-ocular surgery within one year.
  • Patient is unavailable for follow-up visits.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02569892). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search