Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=3,092 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of QVM149 With QMF149 in Patients With Asthma

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02571777 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
3,092
Serious AEs
7.3%
Results posted
Jul 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Trough FEV1) of QVM149 Versus QMF149 at Week 26 — 2.050; 2.029; 1.984; 1.953 litre (L) — p=<0.001
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
157citations · ~26 / year
Once-daily, single-inhaler mometasone-indacaterol-glycopyrronium versus mometasone-indacaterol or twice-daily fluticasone-salmeterol in patients with inadequately controlled asthma (IRIDIUM): a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 3 study.
The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2020 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The purpose of the trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different doses of QVM149 (QVM149 150/50/80 μg and QVM149 150/50/160 μg via Concept1) over two respective QMF149 doses (QMF149 150/160 μg and QMF149 150/320) μg via Concept1 in poorly controlled asthmatics as determined by pulmonary function testing and effects on asthma control.

Linked Publications (5)

  • Once-daily, single-inhaler mometasone-indacaterol-glycopyrronium versus mometasone-indacaterol or twice-daily fluticasone-salmeterol in patients with inadequately controlled asthma (IRIDIUM): a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 3 study.
    The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2020 · 157 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and varying doses of inhaled corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022 · 21 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • One time a day mometasone/indacaterol fixed-dose combination versus two times a day fluticasone/salmeterol in patients with inadequately controlled asthma: pooled analysis from PALLADIUM and IRIDIUM studies.
    BMJ open respiratory research · 2021 · 7 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Triple Therapy with Mometasone/Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium or Doubling the ICS/LABA Dose in GINA Step 4: IRIDIUM Analyses.
    Pulmonary therapy · 2023 · 5 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Efficacy of mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium in patients with inadequately controlled asthma with respect to baseline eosinophil count: Post hoc analysis of IRIDIUM study.
    Respiratory medicine · 2023 · 5 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Trough FEV1) of QVM149 Versus QMF149 at Week 26
2.050; 2.029; 1.984; 1.953; 1.930 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) at Week 26 and Week 52
1.542; 1.543; 1.528; 1.614; 1.628; 1.406 0.729
SECONDARY
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Trough FEV1) of QVM149 Versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone at Week 26
2.050; 2.029; 1.984; 1.953; 1.930 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Trough FEV1 at Week 52
2.050; 1.992; 1.965; 1.930; 1.905 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Pre-dose Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 4 and Week 12
3.091; 3.059; 3.018; 3.020; 2.952; 3.067 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Trough Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF) Between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25-75) at 52 Weeks
1.354; 1.263; 1.260; 1.214; 1.207 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEF) Over 26 and 52 Weeks of Treatment
47.7; 40.5; 29.5; 25.6; 12.5; 39.6 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Asthma Symptom-free Days Over 52 Weeks
22.4; 18.0; 22.2; 18.0; 18.9 0.907
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days With no Daytime Symptoms Over 52 Weeks
22.5; 17.9; 21.8; 18.0; 18.8 0.712
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Nights With no Night-time Awakenings Over 52 Weeks
18.0; 17.6; 18.4; 16.1; 16.9 0.809
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Mornings With no Symptoms on Rising Over 52 Weeks
19.5; 18.5; 19.9; 15.5; 15.6 0.814
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days Without Rescue Medication Use Over 26 and 52 Weeks
22.5; 19.5; 23.3; 18.2; 19.6; 25.0 0.645
SECONDARY
Percentage of Patients Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) ACQ ≥ 0.5 at Week 26 and Week 52
71.2; 71.7; 74.2; 70.7; 67.4; 78.8 0.535
SECONDARY
Time to First Hospitalization for Asthma Exacerbation
367.0; 367.0; 367.0; 367.0; 367.0 0.371
SECONDARY
Time to First Asthma Exacerbation by Exacerbation Category
366.0; 366.0; 366.0; 365.0; 365.0; 366.0 0.523
SECONDARY
Annual Rate of Asthma Exacerbations by Exacerbation Category
0.46; 0.58; 0.54; 0.67; 0.72; 0.26 0.120
SECONDARY
Duration in Days of Asthma Exacerbations by Exacerbation Category
4.5; 5.6; 6.7; 7.1; 8.1; 2.8 0.183
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Asthma Exacerbation by Exacerbation Category
30.2; 32.5; 31.8; 35.9; 39.7; 21.8
SECONDARY
Time in Days to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Medication Due to Asthma Exacerbation
367.0; 367.0; 367.0; 367.0; 367.0 0.314
SECONDARY
Total Amount of Oral Corticosteroid Used (in Prednisone-equivalent mg Doses) to Treat Asthma Exacerbations
53.4; 72.0; 73.2; 82.5; 86.0
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Rescue Medication Free Days Over 26 and 52 Weeks
22.5; 19.5; 23.3; 18.2; 19.6; 25.0 0.645
SECONDARY
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) at Week 52
5.555; 5.445; 5.535; 5.499; 5.495 0.690
SECONDARY
Pre-dose FEV1 at Weeks 4 and 12
2.032; 1.983; 1.963; 1.950; 1.887; 2.024 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Composite Endpoint of Serious Asthma Outcomes
1.4; 2.5; 1.9; 1.6; 1.2

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with a diagnosis of asthma, (GINA 2015) for a period of at least 1 year prior to Visit 1 (Screening).
  • Patients who have used medium or high dose of ICS/LABA combinations for asthma for at least 3 months and at stable medium or high doses of ICS/LABA for at least 1 month prior to Visit 1.
  • Patients must be symptomatic at screening despite treatment with mid or high stable doses of ICS/LABA. Patients with ACQ-7 score ≥ 1.5 at Visit 101 and at Visit 102 (before randomization).
  • Patients with documented history of at least one asthma exacerbation which required medical care from a physician, ER visit (or local equivalent structure) or hospitalization in the 12 months prior to Visit 1, and required systemic corticosteroid treatment.
  • Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of 450 msec for males and > 460 msec for females) and confirmed by a central assessor (these patients should not be rescreened).
  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to lactose, any of the study drugs or to similar drugs within the class including untoward reactions to sympathomimetic amines or inhaled medication or any component thereof.
  • Patients who have not achieved an acceptable spirometry result at Visit 101 in accordance with ATS/ERS criteria for acceptability and repeatability. A one-time repeat spirometry is allowed in an ad-hoc visit scheduled as close as possible from the first attempt (but not on the same day) if the spirometry did not qualify due to ATS/ERS criteria at Visit 101 and/or Visit 102. If the patient fails the repeat assessment, the patient may be rescreened once, provided the patient returns to the required treatment as per inclusion criteria 4.
  • Patients unable to use the Concept1 dry powder inhaler, Accuhaler or a metered dose inhaler. Spacer devices are not permitted.
  • History of alcohol or other substance abuse.
  • Patients with a known history of non-compliance to medication or who were unable or unwilling to complete a patient diary or who are unable or unwilling to use Electronic Peak Flow with e-diary device.
  • Patients who do not maintain regular day/night, waking/sleeping cycles (e.g., night shift workers).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02571777) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search