Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=60 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

The Viability of Short Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Osteoarthritis of Hip

Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
Results posted
Aug 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean VR-12 Mental Composite Score Through 2 Years Post Operative — 47.3; 50.6; 54.9; 53.8 T-Score

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Taperloc standard length stem (Device); Taperloc short length stem (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Northwestern University
Primary completion
Aug 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean VR-12 Mental Composite Score Through 2 Years Post Operative
47.3; 50.6; 54.9; 53.8; 56.4; 56.9
PRIMARY
Mean VR-12 Physical Composite Score Through 2 Years Post Operative
25.2; 23.6; 37.0; 37.8; 42.1; 40.1
PRIMARY
PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Behavior Through 2 Years Post-operative
59.2; 61.3; 51.9; 51.0; 48.0; 52.0
PRIMARY
PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Physical Function Through 2 Years Post-operative
29.6; 31.7; 41.00; 42.6; 45.5; 45.4
PRIMARY
PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) for Pain Interference Through 2 Years Post-operative
64.6; 67.4; 51.7; 53.1; 49.7; 51.1
SECONDARY
EBRA (Ein-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse) Femoral Component Analysis (EBRA-FCA) of Implant Subsidence Through 2 Years Post Operative
0.124; 0.193; 0.448; 0.702; 0.526; 1.303

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the viability of short femoral stems as an alternative to standard-length stems in total hip arthroplasty.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Must require a total hip arthroplasty.
  • Ages 18-85 years, regardless of gender, ethnicity, or pathology

Exclusion Criteria

  • This study excludes any populations at risk.
  • Minors, as well as any persons unable to consent, will not be eligible.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02577822). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search