Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=30

Study of Human Epidermal Growth Receptor (HER2) Status Evaluation in Breast Cancer Pathology Samples

Breast Cancer

Enrolled (actual)
30
Serious AEs
Results posted
Feb 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With Immunohistochemical (IHC) Evaluation Between Site A and Others (Sites B, C, D and E) — 16.7; 12.5; 0.0; 8.3 percentage of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Primary completion
Oct 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With Immunohistochemical (IHC) Evaluation Between Site A and Others (Sites B, C, D and E)
16.7; 12.5; 0.0; 8.3; 4.2; 12.5
PRIMARY
Kappa Coefficient (K) as a Measure of Agreement Between Site A and Others (Sites B, C, D and E) Concerning the IHC Test of Breast Tissue Samples
0.171; 0.090; -0.148; -0.124 =0.137
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With IHC Evaluation Between Sites B and Others (Sites C, D and E)
12.5; 4.2; 0.0; 4.2; 4.2; 12.5
PRIMARY
Kappa Coefficient as a Measure of Agreement Between Site B and Others (Sites C, D and E) Concerning the IHC Test of Breast Tissue Samples
0.224; 0.000; 0.05 =0.054
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With IHC Evaluation Between Site C and Others (Sites D and E)
8.3; 4.2; 8.3; 16.7; 4.2; 4.2
PRIMARY
Kappa Coefficient as a Measure of Agreement Between Sites C, D and E Concerning the IHC Test of Breast Tissue Samples
-0.137; 0.259; -0.317 =0.246
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With IHC Evaluation Between Abroad and Trial Sites (A, B, C, D and E)
16.7; 13.3; 10.0; 3.3; 6.7; 3.3
PRIMARY
Kappa Coefficient as a Measure of Agreement Between Abroad and Trial Sites (A, B, C, D and E) Concerning the IHC Test of Breast Tissue Samples
0.002; 0.260; 0.226; -0.063; 0.04 =0.988
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Diagnosis of Primary Tumor
93.3; 3.3; 3.3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Initial Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Stage According to Council Decision
33.3; 54.2; 8.3; 4.2; 50.0; 16.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Pathological Score
0.0; 43.3; 56.7; 0.0; 33.3; 66.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Pathological Grade
0.0; 56.7; 43.3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Different Hormone Receptors
71.3; 42.69
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Specified Density of Hormone Receptors
4.0; 8.0; 16.0; 72.0; 12.0; 28.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With HER2 Test Form Based on Country
80.0; 20.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With HER2 Test Form Based on Different Automated Slide Stainers
20.0; 16.0; 16.0; 48.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With HER2 Test Form Based on Antigen Retrieval
16.0; 32.0; 16.0; 16.0; 20.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With HER2 Test Form Based on Primary Antibody
16.0; 16.0; 16.0; 16.0; 36.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Different IHC Results
36.7; 20.7; 20.7; 22.0

Summary

A multi-center non-interventional, in-vitro trial for evaluation of concordance of the results for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) expression by the Immunohistochemical (IHC) method in pathological samples collected from participants with breast cancer.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Samples that fulfill all of the criteria will be evaluated for the study.

  • Samples of women aged greater than or equal to (>/=) 18 and less than (<) 75 years
  • Tumor samples already diagnosed based on the IHC score of 0 to +3
  • Samples of primary lesions excluding lymph nodes
  • 10 percent (%) neutral buffered formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tissue samples

Exclusion Criteria

Samples that fulfill any of the criteria below will not be included in the study.

  • Non-invasive ductal carcinoma (NOS) samples
  • Tru-cut biopsies
  • Non-breast cancer pathological samples
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02580799). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search