N/A
N=607
Comparison of Nutrition Risk Screens
Malnutrition
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02585245 ↗Enrolled (actual)
607
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Nov 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: The Percent of Participants Identified With Malnutrition Using the NRS 2002 and ThedaCare Nutrition Risk Screen — 63.5; 98.8; 94.3; 74 percentage of participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Observational
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- —
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- ThedaCare
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY The Percent of Participants Identified With Malnutrition Using the NRS 2002 and ThedaCare Nutrition Risk Screen |
63.5; 98.8; 94.3; 74 | — |
Summary
This research study will compare two different screens for nutrition risk in patients who are in the hospital. We will be comparing the ThedaCare Nutrition Risk Screen to see if it is as good and consistent as the standard NRS 2002 Nutrition Risk Screen.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- 18 yrs of age
- Hopitalized
Exclusion Criteria
- Positve for Pregnancy
- Inability to give Consent
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02585245). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.