Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=9 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Comparison of Amnion Chorion Membrane vs. Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane in Ridge Preservation Procedures

Alveolar Bone Loss · Pathological Conditions, Anatomical

Enrolled (actual)
9
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Amount of Preservation of Alveolar Ridge Dimensions i.e..,Clinical Horizontal Ridge Width Change in Millimeter as Result of Ridge Preservation Procedures — 2.54; 2.72 millimeters

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Placing Amnion chorion membrane over grafted site (Device); Placing d-PTFE membrane over grafted site (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Indiana University
Primary completion
Jul 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Amount of Preservation of Alveolar Ridge Dimensions i.e..,Clinical Horizontal Ridge Width Change in Millimeter as Result of Ridge Preservation Procedures
2.54; 2.72
PRIMARY
Evaluation of Preservation of Ridge Quality Through Microtomographic Analysis for Microarchitectural Parameters Expressed as Percentages.
51.74; 37.31
PRIMARY
Evaluation of Preservation of Ridge Quality Through Histological Analysis for Microarchitectural Parameters Expressed as Percentages.
8.31; 3.50
PRIMARY
Post Operative Pain
1.82; 4.09
PRIMARY
Amount of Preservation of Alveolar Ridge Dimensions Following Ridge Preservation Procedures i.e., Horizontal Ridge Width Height Change in Millimeters as Assessed Through Analysis of CBCT Scans.
1.33; 2.53
PRIMARY
Amount of Preservation of Alveolar Ridge Dimensions Following Ridge Preservation Procedures i.e., Vertical Ridge Height Change in Millimeters as Assessed Through Analysis of CBCT Scans.
-0.24; 1.18

Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine if a biologically active commercially available amnion chorion membrane (ACM) is as effective as the commercially available inert dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane (D-PTFE) in preserving jaw bone dimensions and whether it provides the added benefit of reducing post-operative discomfort after dental surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects needing bilateral non-molar dental extractions in the same arch and consenting to a 2nd surgery for core-biopsy participated in the study. Subjects were required to be within the American Academy of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classifications ASA I or ASA II. Males between 18-75 years and females between 18-50 years of age were screened.

Exclusion Criteria

  • inability or anticipated failure to maintain adequate oral hygiene; evidence of active periodontitis; pregnant or breastfeeding mothers, unstable systemic diseases or with compromised immune system (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, etc.) or unstable bleeding disorders; active infectious diseases (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis, HIV, etc.); mental disabilities that may hinder participation; active immunosuppressive therapy, cancer therapy and/or radiation to the oral cavity within last 6-months; conditions/medications contraindicated for bone regeneration (e.g., methotrexate, steroids, bisphosphonates, cyclosporin-A), and and self-reported tobacco usage (equivalent to >20 cigarettes per day).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02602223). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search