Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=413 Randomized Treatment

Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab Versus Usual Care on Top of Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Mixed Dyslipidemia (ODYSSEY DM-Dyslipidemia)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02642159 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
413
Serious AEs
9.2%
Results posted
May 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24: Overall Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis — -37.3; -4.7 Percent change — p=<0.0001
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
126citations · ~21 / year
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020 · Likely link

Summary

Primary Objective: To demonstrate the superiority of alirocumab in comparison with usual care in the reduction of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) in participants with type 2 diabetes and mixed dyslipidemia at high cardiovascular risk with non-HDL-C not adequately controlled with maximally tolerated statin therapy. Secondary Objectives: * To demonstrate whether alirocumab is superior in comparison with usual care in its effects on other lipid parameters (ie, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein B (Apo B), total cholesterol (Total -C), lipoprotein a (Lp[a]), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TGs), triglyceride rich lipoproteins (TGRLs), apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1), apolipoprotein C-III (Apo C-III), lipid subfractions by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (ie, LDL-C particle size and LDL, very low-density lipoprotein [VLDL], HDL, and intermediate-density lipoprotein [IDL] particle number). * To assess changes in glycemic parameters with alirocumab vs. usual care treatment. * To demonstrate the safety and tolerability of alirocumab. * To evaluate treatment acceptance of alirocumab. * To evaluate proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) concentrations and antibody development. * To demonstrate the superiority of alirocumab vs. fenofibrate on non-HDL-C and other lipid parameters (subgroup analysis).

Linked Publications (5)

  • PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020 · 126 citations · Likely link
  • Alirocumab vs usual lipid-lowering care as add-on to statin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes and mixed dyslipidaemia: The ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA randomized trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2018 · 101 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Alirocumab therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: analysis of the ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA and DM-INSULIN studies.
    Cardiovascular diabetology · 2019 · 48 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Effect of alirocumab on individuals with type 2 diabetes, high triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
    Cardiovascular diabetology · 2020 · 32 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Design and rationale of the ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA trial: lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of alirocumab in individuals with type 2 diabetes and mixed dyslipidaemia at high cardiovascular risk.
    Cardiovascular diabetology · 2017 · 30 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24: Overall Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis
-37.3; -4.7 <0.0001 sig
PRIMARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum
-41.7; -8.5 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Measured Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis
-43.3; -0.3 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum
-47.0; 8.7 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12: Overall ITT Analysis
-35.5; -9.4 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum
-34.7; -7.3 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 12: Overall ITT Analysis
-41.7; -7.0 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Measured LDL-C at Week 12: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum
-44.3; 5.4 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis
-33.8; -1.6 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum
-38.9; -3.8 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24 : Overall ITT Analysis
-27.4; -2.8 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum
-30.9; -5.7 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 24 : Overall ITT Analysis
-23.7; 3.7 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum
-18.9; 3.9 0.0040 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis
-13.0; -8.8 0.2191
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum
-15.4; -24.4 0.2651
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 : Overall ITT Analysis
14.5; 8.2
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum
13.5; 12.3
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Particle Number at Week 24: Overall ITT Analysis
-41.6; -3.9
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Particle Number at Week 24: ITT- Intent to Prescribe Fenofibrate Stratum
-45.4; -2.9
SECONDARY
Absolute Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT Analysis
0.59; 0.43; 2.84; 2.40
SECONDARY
Absolute Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT Analysis
0.45; 0.21; 0.68; 0.03
SECONDARY
Absolute Change From Baseline in Number of Glucose-Lowering Treatments at Week 12 and 24 : Overall ITT Analysis
0.04; 0.04; 0.07; 0.04

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants with type 2 diabetes and mixed dyslipidemia whose non-HDL-C was not adequately controlled with a stable, maximum dose/regimen of statin that was tolerated by the participant.
  • 18 years of age or more.
  • Documented history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor.
  • Non-HDL-C of 100 mg/dL or greater.
  • Triglycerides greater than or equal to 150 mg/dL and less than 500 mg/dL.
  • Stable anti-hyperglycemic agents for at least 3 months prior to the screening visit and between screening and randomization (including stable insulin dose defined as no variation more than 30% in daily insulin dose within the preceding 3 months, as judged by the Investigator).
  • No change in weight of more than 5 kg within the prior 3 months.
  • On stable dose of medications that are known to influence weight and/or lipids within the last 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Use of any lipid modifying therapies other than statins within the last 4 weeks (eg, ezetimibe, fenofibrate, nicotinic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, etc.) or use of over the counter products/nutraceuticals known to impact lipids (eg, red yeast rice) within the last 4 weeks.
  • Currently drinking more than 2 standard alcoholic drinks per day.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) >45 kg/m² or currently enrolled in a weight loss program and still in active phase of weight loss.
  • Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 9% or greater.

The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02642159) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search