Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=801 Randomized Treatment

Etomidate Versus Ketamine for Emergency Endotracheal Intubation: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Cardiopulmonary Arrest · Respiratory Arrest
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02643381 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
801
Serious AEs
2.4%
Results posted
Dec 2021
Primary outcomePrimary: Survival at Day 7 — 306; 336 Participants
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
163citations · ~20 / year
Measuring the cost and effect of current community consultation and public disclosure techniques in emergency care research.
Resuscitation · 2018 · High-confidence link

Summary

Patients who are having problems breathing sometimes require placement of a breathing tube in their mouth and windpipe. The purpose of this breathing tube is to save the patient's life. It is common to give the patient a medication to sedate him or her before the breathing tube is placed. For patients who are gravely ill two medications are commonly used: etomidate or ketamine. Both medications have risks and benefits. Researchers at UT-Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Memorial Hospital would like to do a study to figure out which one is better for our patients.

Linked Publications (2)

  • Measuring the cost and effect of current community consultation and public disclosure techniques in emergency care research.
    Resuscitation · 2018 · 7 citations · High-confidence link
  • Etomidate versus ketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial.
    Intensive care medicine · 2022 · 163 citations · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Survival at Day 7
306; 336
SECONDARY
Survival at Day 28
254; 264
SECONDARY
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Scores
10.7; 10.9; 9.8; 9.5; 8.4; 8.4
SECONDARY
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
5; 5
SECONDARY
Duration of Catecholamine Therapy
1; 1
SECONDARY
Length of Stay in ICU
8; 9
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With New Diagnosis of Adrenal Insufficiency
11; 4
SECONDARY
Number of Attempts Necessary to Intubate
357; 355; 29; 26; 4; 5

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patient (male or female) requiring emergency endotracheal intubation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Children (<18 years old).
  • Women who are known to be pregnant.
  • Any patient who has been previously randomized in the EvK Trial.
  • Patients who require endotracheal intubation without sedative medication. For example, patients in full cardiac arrest.
  • Patients with a known allergy to ketamine or etomidate.
  • Any individual wearing a MedAlert bracelet indicating that he/she has formally opted out of the EvK Trial.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02643381) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search