Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=16,801 Randomized Prevention

Risk Stratification in Acute Care: The Meaning of suPAR Measurement in Triage

Triage · Risk Stratification With Biomarker

Enrolled (actual)
16,801
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: All Cause Mortality — 1126; 1241 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
suPAR measurement (Behavioral)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 16+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Herlev Hospital
Primary completion
Apr 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
All Cause Mortality
319; 359
SECONDARY
All Cause Mortality
319; 359
SECONDARY
Number of Discharges From the Emergency Room Within 24 Hours
3934; 4352
SECONDARY
Number of Admissions to the Medical Ward
3500; 3738
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With an Admission to the Intensive Care Unit
1027; 1157
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With New Cancer Diagnosis in Control vs Intervention Groups
687; 917
SECONDARY
Length of Stay During Admission.
4.53; 4.39
SECONDARY
Number of Readmissions
687; 917

Summary

Will clinical outcome for patients be improved if triage in Acute wards and Emergency rooms is supplemented with a prognostic biomarker?

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients presenting acutely to the Acute ward/Emergency department and have blood samples done which include both Hemoglobin, C reactive protein and Creatinine within 6 hours of registration within the study period. The study is carried out in 2 Hospitals in the Capital of Denmark.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients presenting in Pediatric, Gynecological or Obstetric units. Patients not being examined with blood samples.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02643459). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search