Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=150 Randomized

Miller Straight Blade vs Macintosh Blade

Intubation; Difficult
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02664532 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
150
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2016
Primary outcomePrimary: Ease of Intubation or Degree of Difficulty With Intubation — 52; 54; 23; 16 participants

Summary

The purpose of this prospective open labeled randomized study was to compare the "laryngoscopic glottis view" as well as "ease of intubation" between the two blades in routine intubations in non-difficult airways.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Ease of Intubation or Degree of Difficulty With Intubation
52; 54; 23; 16; 0; 5 —
SECONDARY
Cormack Lehane Grading
69; 51; 6; 18; 0; 6 —
SECONDARY
Number of Intubation Attempts
75; 74; 0; 1 —
SECONDARY
Total Laryngoscopy Duration in Seconds
23; 20.5 —

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All ASA I & II grade patients undergoing elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with oral endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with anticipated difficult airway
  • Cervical spine disorders
  • Anesthesia requiring rapid sequence induction
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02664532). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search