N/A
N=1,217
Effects of Self-efficacy, Planning, and Self-efficacy+Planning Interventions on Body Fat Among Adolescents
Adolescent Behavior
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02689973 ↗Enrolled (actual)
1,217
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Body Fat Tissue — 21.12; 21.99; 21.69; 21.81 percentage of body fat
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Self-Efficacy (Behavioral); Planning (Behavioral); Education (Behavioral)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult · 14+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw
- Primary completion
- Jun 2015
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Body Fat Tissue |
21.12; 21.99; 21.69; 21.81; 21.93; 22.68 | — |
| SECONDARY Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) |
7.09; 6.81; 7.11; 7.44; 7.18; 7.52 | — |
| SECONDARY The Use of Physical Activity Planning (the Use of Planning) |
2.68; 2.64; 2.74; 2.66; 2.60; 2.76 | — |
| SECONDARY Physical Activity Self-efficacy (PA Self-efficacy) |
2.60; 2.59; 2.70; 2.61; 2.80; 2.85 | — |
Summary
This longitudinal experimental study tested the effects of three brief interventions: (1) prompting the formation of plans (or implementation intentions), (2) prompting self-efficacy beliefs, and (3) prompting planning + self-efficacy in adolescents aged 14-18 years relative to an active 'education only' control group.
It was hypothesized that participants assigned to the interventions would exhibit a smaller increase in body fat at 14-month follow-up compared to controls. The study also investigated whether the combined planning + self-efficacy intervention would have larger effects on the main outcome (body fat) than single-component interventions. Second, it was hypothesized that the effects of the intervention conditions on body fat at 14-month follow-up would be mediated by their respective psychological and behavioral constructs: self-efficacy and planning at T2 (Mediator 1), and by moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at T3 (Mediator 2). It was expected that the effects of the interventions including the planning component (i.e., planning intervention and self-efficacy + planning intervention) would be mediated by respective cognitions, i.e. planning, whereas the effects of the interventions including self-efficacy component (i.e., self-efficacy intervention and self-efficacy + planning intervention) would be mediated by self-efficacy. Finally, it was explored whether the effects of the intervention (both direct and indirect effects, via their respective psychological variables and MVPA) on body fat would be moderated by the presence of built PA facilities, located in the proximity of schools.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Healthy adolescents
- Adolescents with chronic conditions but without contraindications for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
Exclusion Criteria
- Adolescents who were younger than 14 years old
- Adolescents who declared plans for changing schools during the following year (e.g., due to graduation or moving to another region)
- No parental consent at the baseline
- Existing diseases with contraindications for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02689973). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.