Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=1,217 Randomized Double-blind Prevention

Effects of Self-efficacy, Planning, and Self-efficacy+Planning Interventions on Body Fat Among Adolescents

Adolescent Behavior

Enrolled (actual)
1,217
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Body Fat Tissue — 21.12; 21.99; 21.69; 21.81 percentage of body fat

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Self-Efficacy (Behavioral); Planning (Behavioral); Education (Behavioral)
Age
Pediatric, Adult · 14+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw
Primary completion
Jun 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Body Fat Tissue
21.12; 21.99; 21.69; 21.81; 21.93; 22.68
SECONDARY
Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)
7.09; 6.81; 7.11; 7.44; 7.18; 7.52
SECONDARY
The Use of Physical Activity Planning (the Use of Planning)
2.68; 2.64; 2.74; 2.66; 2.60; 2.76
SECONDARY
Physical Activity Self-efficacy (PA Self-efficacy)
2.60; 2.59; 2.70; 2.61; 2.80; 2.85

Summary

This longitudinal experimental study tested the effects of three brief interventions: (1) prompting the formation of plans (or implementation intentions), (2) prompting self-efficacy beliefs, and (3) prompting planning + self-efficacy in adolescents aged 14-18 years relative to an active 'education only' control group. It was hypothesized that participants assigned to the interventions would exhibit a smaller increase in body fat at 14-month follow-up compared to controls. The study also investigated whether the combined planning + self-efficacy intervention would have larger effects on the main outcome (body fat) than single-component interventions. Second, it was hypothesized that the effects of the intervention conditions on body fat at 14-month follow-up would be mediated by their respective psychological and behavioral constructs: self-efficacy and planning at T2 (Mediator 1), and by moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at T3 (Mediator 2). It was expected that the effects of the interventions including the planning component (i.e., planning intervention and self-efficacy + planning intervention) would be mediated by respective cognitions, i.e. planning, whereas the effects of the interventions including self-efficacy component (i.e., self-efficacy intervention and self-efficacy + planning intervention) would be mediated by self-efficacy. Finally, it was explored whether the effects of the intervention (both direct and indirect effects, via their respective psychological variables and MVPA) on body fat would be moderated by the presence of built PA facilities, located in the proximity of schools.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Healthy adolescents
  • Adolescents with chronic conditions but without contraindications for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Exclusion Criteria

  • Adolescents who were younger than 14 years old
  • Adolescents who declared plans for changing schools during the following year (e.g., due to graduation or moving to another region)
  • No parental consent at the baseline
  • Existing diseases with contraindications for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02689973). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search