Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=80 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Wound Infiltration for Postcesarean Analgesia

Postcesarean Analgesia

Enrolled (actual)
80
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Cumulative Fentanyl Dose — 157.4; 153.3 mcg

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Spinal anesthesia (Procedure); Intrathecal bupivacaine (Drug); Intrathecal fentanyl (Drug); Cesarean delivery (Procedure); Wound infiltration (Procedure); Sham procedure (Procedure); Transversus abdominis plane block (Procedure); Ketorolac (Drug); Paracetamol (Drug); Fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia (Procedure)
Age
Adult · 19+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Mansoura University
Primary completion
May 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Cumulative Fentanyl Dose
SECONDARY
Cumulative Fentanyl Dose
SECONDARY
Time to the First Postoperative Fentanyl Administration
SECONDARY
Pain Scores at Rest and Movement
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Nausea and/or Vomiting
SECONDARY
Level of Sedation
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Pruritis
SECONDARY
Level of Patient Satisfaction

Summary

The study will compare the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block and wound infiltration in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II
  • Full-term singleton pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age 40 years
  • Height <150 cm
  • Weight <60 kg
  • Body mass index ≥40 kg/m2
  • Contraindications to spinal anesthesia (patient refusal, increased intracranial tension, coagulopathy, uncorrected hypovolemia)
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the drugs used in the study
  • Significant cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic disease
  • Known fetal abnormalities
  • Emergency situations
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02691572). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search