Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=100 Randomized Single-blind Supportive Care

Vanguard TKA With KneeAlign 2 and Without KneeAlign 2

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Enrolled (actual)
100
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Proportion of Subjects That Have Alignment Within 2 Degrees From Neutral on Tibia — 41; 31; 4; 14 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
KneeAlign 2 (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 20+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Zimmer Biomet
Primary completion
Oct 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Proportion of Subjects That Have Alignment Within 2 Degrees From Neutral on Tibia
41; 31; 4; 14
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Tibial Posterior Slope Alignment Within Predetermined Threshold
26; 27; 19; 18
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Femoral Varus/Valgus Angle Within Predetermined Threshold
35; 28; 10; 17
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Adverse Events and/or Adverse Device Effects
1; 0

Summary

Purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the KneeAlign 2 system in terms of precise implant alignment by demonstrating that KneeAlign 2 provides better tibial alignment compared to conventional instruments

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Knee (either unilateral or bilateral) Osteoarthritis (varus deformity only)
  • Subjects willing to return for follow-up evaluations

Exclusion Criteria

  • Knee degenerative diseases other than Knee Osteoarthritis (such as necrosis / Rheumatoid Arthritis)
  • Severe OA deformation (FTA: >185 degrees or <175 degrees)
  • Active Infection (or within 6 weeks after infection)
  • Sepsis
  • Osteomyelitis
  • Any type of implant is inserted in the affected side of lower extremity
  • Hip disease on the affected side
  • Uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who are incapable of following directions
  • diagnosed Osteoporosis or Osteomalacia
  • Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation
  • Distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site
  • Rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram
  • Vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy or neuromuscular disease.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02695329). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search