Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=200 Randomized Screening

Accuracy of Commercially Available Heart Rate Monitors

Healthy
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02697214 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
200
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Measuring the Accuracy of Commercial Heart Rate Monitors. — .91; .84; .91; .83 Correlation Coefficient

Summary

Over the last two decades, there has been a proliferation of commercially available heart rate monitors. Recognizing that elite athletes often use heart rate to monitor training and assess aerobic fitness, fitness companies have offered a variety of heart rate monitoring systems to the general public. Recently, there has been a move from monitors that rely on chest straps to measure electrical activity toward more convenient, wrist-worn monitors that employ optical sensing technology similar to that used for pulse oximetry. While the accuracy of chest strap monitors has been assessed in a variety of studies, there is no data concerning the accuracy of wrist-worn heart rate monitors. Assessment of the monitors' accuracy is important both for the subjects who rely upon these monitors to guide their athletic activity and for the physicians to whom these individuals report their heart rate readings.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Measuring the Accuracy of Commercial Heart Rate Monitors.
.91; .84; .91; .83

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • Able and willing to exercise (walk/jog) for a total of fifteen minutes

Exclusion Criteria

  • Health issues that preclude or contraindicate walking and/or jogging, including cardiovascular, orthopedic, pulmonary and other conditions
  • Presence of a cardiac pacemaker
  • Known cardiovascular disease
  • Known heart rhythm disorders
  • Use of Beta-blockers or antiarrhythmic medications
  • Tattoos around the wrist area
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02697214). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search