Phase 3
N=152
Study of Cefiderocol (S-649266) or Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Severe Infections Caused by Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Pathogens
Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP) · Bloodstream Infections (BSI) · Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP) · Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) · Sepsis
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02714595 ↗Enrolled (actual)
152
Serious AEs
48.7%
Results posted
Dec 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis — 50.0; 52.6; 43.5; 42.9 percentage of participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Interventions
- Cefiderocol (Drug); Best Available Therapy (Drug)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Shionogi
- Primary completion
- Apr 2019
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis |
50.0; 52.6; 43.5; 42.9 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With cUTI |
52.9; 20.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis |
60.0; 63.2; 69.6; 50.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis |
50.0; 31.6; 39.1; 28.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With cUTI |
70.6; 60.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With cUTI |
76.5; 60.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI |
52.9; 60.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall |
63.5; 57.6; 66.3; 57.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall |
47.6; 48.5; 52.5; 50.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall |
46.0; 30.3; 47.5; 34.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline Pathogen |
61.5; 70.0; 70.0; 42.9; 0; 63.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline Pathogen |
50.0; 60.0; 30.0; 42.9; 0; 44.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Pathogen |
50.0; 60.0; 30.0; 28.6; 0.0; 44.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen |
61.5; 70.0; 70.0; 42.9; 0.0; 63.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen |
50.0; 60.0; 30.0; 42.9; 0.0; 44.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen |
50.0; 40.0; 30.0; 28.6; 0.0; 44.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis |
30.0; 26.3; 60.9; 28.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis |
22.5; 21.1; 30.4; 28.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis |
20.0; 15.8; 26.1; 21.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With cUTI |
70.6; 20.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI |
41.2; 20.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall |
41.3; 27.3; 47.5; 26.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall |
25.4; 24.2; 31.3; 23.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall |
22.2; 18.2; 26.3; 18.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Pathogen |
34.6; 30.0; 60.0; 28.6; 0.0; 41.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Pathogen |
30.8; 30.0; 20.0; 28.6; 0.0; 27.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Pathogen |
26.9; 20.0; 20.0; 14.3; 0.0; 25.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen |
34.6; 30.0; 60.0; 28.6; 0.0; 41.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen |
30.8; 30.0; 20.0; 28.6; 0.0; 27.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen |
26.9; 20.0; 20.0; 14.3; 0.0; 25.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia |
54.5; 30.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia |
31.8; 30.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia |
27.3; 23.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT |
30.0; 26.3; 56.5; 21.4; 70.6; 20.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC |
22.5; 21.1; 30.4; 21.4; 47.1; 20.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up |
20.0; 15.8; 26.1; 14.3; 41.2; 20.0 | — |
| SECONDARY All-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28 |
24.4; 13.6; 16.7; 5.9; 11.5; 20.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Alive and With No Change in Antibiotic Treatment Due to Either Lack of Therapeutic Benefit or Drug-related Toxicity at TOC |
62.5; 60.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Survival Time |
12; 3; 9; 3; 1; 2 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) in Participants With Pneumonia (HAP/VAP/HCAP) |
-2.5; -1.9; -3.1; -2.7; -3.4; -2.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) |
-0.7; -1.6; -2.1; -0.2; -0.6; -1.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Adverse Events |
92; 47; 23; 9; 26; 16 | — |
Summary
This study is designed to provide evidence of efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections in adult patients caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients with clinically documented infection (HAP/VAP/HCAP, cUTI, or BSI/sepsis) caused by a Gram-negative pathogen with evidence of carbapenem resistance
- Patients who have been treated previously with an empiric antibiotic regiment and failed treatment, both clinically and microbiologically, are eligible for the study, if they have an identified carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen which has either been shown to be nonsusceptible in vitro to each of the antibiotic(s) of the empiric antibiotic regimen or been grown from a culture performed after at least 2 days of the empiric antibiotic regimen
- Patient is male (no contraception required) or female and meets one of the following criteria:
- Surgically sterile by hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral salpingectomy or tubal ligation for the purpose of contraception for at least 6 weeks with appropriate documentation of such surgery
- Postmenopausal (defined as older than 45 years of age with cessation of regular menstrual periods for 6 months and confirmed by a follicle-stimulating hormone level of > 40 mIU/mL, or amenorrhea for at least 12 months)
- Of childbearing potential and using combined (estrogen and progestogen) or progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (including oral, intravaginal, injectable, implantable, and transdermal contraceptives), or an intrauterine device (IUD), or intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS) for the entire duration of the study
- Of childbearing potential and practice abstinence as a preferred and usual lifestyle, and agrees to continue practicing abstinence from Screening and for the entire duration of the study
- Of childbearing potential, whose sole heterosexual partner has been successfully vasectomized and agrees to not have other heterosexual partners for the entire duration of the study
- Patients meeting specific criteria for each infection site
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients who have a history of any moderate or severe hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any β-lactam (Note: for β-lactams, a history of a mild rash followed by uneventful re-exposure is not a contraindication to enrollment)
- Patients who need more than 3 systemic antibiotics as part of best available therapy (BAT) for the treatment of the Gram-negative infection (patients with mixed Gram-positive or anaerobic infections may receive appropriate concomitant narrow spectrum antibiotics [eg, vancomycin, linezolid, metronidazole, clindamycin])
- Patients with coinfection caused by invasive aspergillosis, mucormycosis or other highly lethal mold
- Patients who have central nervous system (CNS) infection (eg, meningitis, brain abscess, shunt infection)
- Patients with infection requiring > 3 weeks of antibiotic treatment (eg, bone and joint infection, endocarditis)
- Patients with cystic fibrosis or moderate to severe bronchiectasis
- Patients in refractory septic shock defined as persistent hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation or despite vasopressive therapy at the time of Randomization
- Patients with severe neutropenia, ie, polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) 30
- Patients who have received a potentially effective antibiotic regimen for the carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infection for a continuous duration of more than 24 hours in cUTI, or 36 hours in HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/sepsis during the 72 hours leading to Randomization
- Patients with any condition or circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the study data
- Patients who have received another investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to study entry
- Patients who have previously been randomized in this study or received S-649266
- Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis
- Patients meeting specific exclusion criteria for each infection site
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02714595). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.