Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=60 Treatment

JetStream Atherectomy for the Treatment of In-stent Restenosis

Femoropopliteal In-stent Restenosis

Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
35.0%
Results posted
Jan 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) — 12 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
JetStream XC with balloon angioplasty (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation
Primary completion
Feb 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
12
PRIMARY
Major Adverse Events (MAE)
6
SECONDARY
Device Outcome
25
SECONDARY
Procedural Success
35
SECONDARY
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) With no Bailout Stent Included
6
SECONDARY
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
18
SECONDARY
Clinical Patency
15
SECONDARY
Clinical Patency
15
SECONDARY
Change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire Score
21.8
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Rutherford Clinical Category Improvement
38
SECONDARY
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index
0.2
SECONDARY
Change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire at 1 Year
38.7
SECONDARY
Rutherford Clinical Category
35
SECONDARY
Ankle Brachial Index
0.2
SECONDARY
Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization
11
SECONDARY
Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization
11

Summary

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that Jetstream atherectomy (JS) and adjunctive balloon angioplasty (PTA) (JS +PTA) improves target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 months follow-up when compared to historic data from PTA alone in the treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) arterial In-stent restenotic (ISR) disease. This is a prospective, multicenter, single arm study evaluating the investigational use of Jetstream Atherectomy (JS) and adjunctive balloon angioplasty (JS +PTA) in the treatment of FP ISR lesions in subjects with claudication or limb ischemia (Rutherford clinical category (RCC) of 2-4) (lesion length ≥ 4 cm). The comparator arm is historic data from plain old balloon angioplasty derived from a Meta-analysis of the 3 published randomized trials in the field.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (Rutherford Becker Class II to IV)
  • Previously treated with stenting in the femoropopliteal segment
  • No limit on how many times the target in-stent restenotic lesion has been previously treated.
  • There is no exclusion based on how the prior treatment was done including if drug eluting balloons or stents have been used. Covered stents cannot be included
  • There is no limit on the length of the target lesion as long as only one target lesion is treated and enrolled

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible to participate in this study:

  • Subject is 18 years of age or older.
  • Subject presents with clinical evidence of peripheral arterial disease with ISR in the femoropopliteal segment (includes common femoral, superficial femoral and popliteal)
  • Subject presents with a Rutherford Classification of 2-4 and has symptoms of rest limb pain or claudication.
  • Target lesion(s) must be viewed angiographically and have ≥50% stenosis.
  • The atherectomy wire must be placed entirely across all lesions to be treated with no visible evidence of clear or suspected subintimal/substent wire passage.
  • The main target vessel reference diameter must be > or = 5 mm and ≤ 7 mm
  • One patent distal run-off vessel with <70% disease and with brisk flow is required.
  • Intraluminal crossing of the lesion. If this is not certain, IVUS may be used to verify this per operator's discretion
  • Patient has signed approved informed consent.
  • Patient is willing to comply with the follow-up evaluations at specified times.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02730234). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search