Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=85 Randomized Single-blind Other

Repeated Versus Varied Simulation Scenarios to Teach Medical Students the Management of a Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation

Education, Medical
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02754310 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
85
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Management Score on Transfer Scenario n°1 — 8.3; 8.0 units on a scale

Summary

Repeated exposure to simulated cases has been shown to improve performance, but repeating the same scenario may impair the ability of learners to transfer their knowledge and skills to slightly different situations. The objective of this study is to compare the use of repeated versus varied simulation cases for teaching the management of pediatric asthma exacerbation to 3rd year medical students.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Management Score on Transfer Scenario n°1
8.3; 8.0
SECONDARY
Management Score on Transfer Scenario n°2
3.0; 4.0
SECONDARY
Management Score on Evaluation Scenario n°1
13.6; 13.8
SECONDARY
Management Score on Evaluation Scenario n°2
7.5; 7.5
SECONDARY
Management Score on Transfer Scenario n°3
13.0; 12.3
SECONDARY
Management Score on Transfer Scenario n°4
2.0; 3.0

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Third year medical students from Paris Descartes and Paris Diderot medical faculties.
  • Who are not opposed to participated in the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Opposition to participate in the study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02754310). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search