Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=25 Diagnostic

Air-charged vs Water-filled Catheters (Bonn)

Urodynamics
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02756182 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
25
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Maximum Vesical Pressure During Valsalva Manoeuvres — 39.31; 39.44 cmH2O

Summary

A comparative study was conducted and the patient underwent a conventional urodynamic study. In order to successfully determine if the Air-Charged (AC) and Water-Perfused (WP) measurements are equivalent, the two sources of intravesical pressure (Pves) and abdominal pressure (Pabd) were collected concurrently at various fill volumes for the bladder.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Maximum Vesical Pressure During Valsalva Manoeuvres
39.31; 39.44
PRIMARY
Maximum Abdominal Pressure During Valsalva Manoeuvres
37.93; 38.11
PRIMARY
Maximum Detrusor Pressure at Valsalva Manoeuvres
1.72; 1.65
SECONDARY
Maximum Vesical Pressure During Coughs
64.59; 69.65
SECONDARY
Maximum Abdominal Pressure During Coughs
60.71; 63.01
SECONDARY
Maximum Detrusor Pressure During Coughs
3.89; 6.83

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients normally indicated for urodynamic evaluations

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who suffer from bladder infections (not including patients with asymptomatic bacteruria, prophylaxis with an antibiotic is at the discretion of the physician)
  • Patients who suffer from strictures in the urethra
  • Patients who are pregnant
  • Patients who require the use of a suprapubic catheter
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02756182). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search