Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=129 Randomized Treatment

SOFEED: Six Food vs. One Food Eosinophilic Esophagitis Diet Study

Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders (EGIDs) · Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02778867 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
129
Serious AEs
0.6%
Results posted
May 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Percent of Participants in Histologic Remission (<15 Eos/Hpf) — 34.3; 40.3 percentage of participants — p=0.58
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
149citations · ~50 / year
One-food versus six-food elimination diet therapy for the treatment of eosinophilic oesophagitis: a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial.
The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The purpose of this interventional study is to test and compare the effectiveness of two elimination diets-the 1-food elimination diet (1FED, milk only) and the 6-food elimination diet (6FED, milk, egg, wheat, soy, tree nut/peanuts, and fish/shellfish). The study will also test the effectiveness of swallowed glucocorticoid therapy in some of the study participants for whom diet therapy was not effective.

Linked Publications

  • One-food versus six-food elimination diet therapy for the treatment of eosinophilic oesophagitis: a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial.
    The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023 · 149 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percent of Participants in Histologic Remission (<15 Eos/Hpf)
34.3; 40.3 0.58
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants in Complete and Partial Histologic Remission
6.0; 21.0; 28.4; 19.4 0.06
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants Following SGC in Histologic Remission in Phase 2
81.8
SECONDARY
Percent of Participants Following 6FED in Histologic Remission in Phase 2
42.9
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Peak Eosinophil Count
-18; -22 0.90
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Total Histology Scoring System
-0.15; -0.23 0.22
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Reference Score
-1.0; -2.0 0.71

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Have diagnosis of EoE (based on consensus criteria)
  • Have histologically confirmed active disease >15 eosinophils/hpf in either distal or proximal esophagus within 12 weeks of screening visit
  • Symptomatic (have experienced symptoms within the last month prior to enrollment)
  • Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) confirmation
  • Have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening if of childbearing potential

Exclusion Criteria

  • Have been treated with topical swallowed steroids within the last 2 months or systemic steroids within the last 3 months
  • Have pathological eosinophilia in segments of the GI tract other than the esophagus determined by local review
  • Have been diagnosed with a GI malabsorption disorder (i.e., Inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease) or Celiac disease
  • Are currently on dietary therapy strictly avoiding milk or on a 6FED
  • Have concurrent H pylori gastritis or parasitic infection
  • Have history of anaphylaxis to milk (with current avoidance of milk)
  • Have previously failed strict dietary therapy clearly documented with one of these regimens or topical steroid treatment (i.e. have achieved histological remission of 1mg budesonide per day).
  • Use of investigational drugs within 4 weeks (one month) prior to enrollment
  • Are concurrently receiving any of the prohibited medications for the study
  • On immunotherapy for pollen (if not on maintenance therapy) or immunoglobulin-E (IgE) -mediated food allergy
  • Past or current medical problems or findings from physical examination or laboratory testing that are not listed above, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may pose additional risks from participation in the study, may interfere with the participant's ability to comply with study requirements or that may impact the quality or interpretation of the data obtained from the study.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02778867) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search