Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=122 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of BF-200 ALA Used With Photodynamic Therapy in Patients With Actinic Keratosis.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02799082 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
122
Serious AEs
1.6%
Results posted
Apr 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Total Patient Clearance Rate 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) — 12.5; 66.3 percentage of participants — p=<0.0001
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
124citations · ~8 / year
Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.
The British journal of dermatology · 2010 · High-confidence link

Summary

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BF-200 ALA (Ameluz) used with photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients suffering from actinic keratosis.

Linked Publications (2)

  • Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.
    The British journal of dermatology · 2010 · 124 citations · High-confidence link
  • Long-term (6 and 12 months) follow-up of two prospective, randomized, controlled phase III trials of photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA and methyl aminolaevulinate for the treatment of actinic keratosis.
    The British journal of dermatology · 2013 · 101 citations · Open access · High-confidence link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Total Patient Clearance Rate 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
10.8; 63.6 <0.0001 sig
PRIMARY
Total Patient Clearance Rate 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
10.8; 63.6 <0.0001 sig
PRIMARY
Total Patient Clearance Rate Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
15.4; 96.4
PRIMARY
Total Patient Clearance Rate Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
15.4; 96.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of AK Lesions Showing Complete Remission 12 Weeks After the Last PDT
20.9; 81.1
SECONDARY
Percentage of AK Lesions Showing Complete Remission Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last PDT
15.1; 96.3
SECONDARY
Change in Total Lesion Size 12 Weeks After the Last PDT
-110.3; -360.2
SECONDARY
Change in Total Lesion Area 12 Weeks After the Last PDT (Treated Area Face)
-94.1; -315.0
SECONDARY
Change in Total Lesion Area 12 Weeks After the Last PDT (Treated Area Scalp)
-112.3; -340.2
SECONDARY
Subjects With Complete Clearance 12 Weeks After the First PDT
10.0; 47.5 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Subjects With Partial Clearance 12 Weeks After the Last PDT
17.5; 78.8 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Overall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDT
4; 19; 6; 19; 21; 39
SECONDARY
Local Skin Reactions
15; 72; 1; 32; 0; 12
SECONDARY
Discomfort During and After PDT
4; 44; 0; 23; 10; 70
SECONDARY
Related Adverse Events /AEs)
15; 72; 10; 70; 4; 44

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects were willing and able to sign informed consent form.
  • Men and women aged between 18 and 85 years inclusive.
  • Subjects had a general good and stable health condition as confirmed by a physical examination and by medical history.
  • Subjects with clinically stable medical conditions including, but not limited to the following diseases were allowed to be included into the study, if the medication taken for the treatment of the disease did not match the criteria of the excluded or disallowed medications listed in points 7, 10, 11 and 12 of the exclusion criteria:
  • controlled hypertension
  • diabetes mellitus type II
  • hypercholesterolemia
  • osteoarthritis
  • Subjects accepted to abstain from sunbathing and the solarium during the study.
  • Subjects had at least 4 but not more than 8 clinically confirmed actinic keratosis (AK) target lesions of mild to moderate intensity within the face or bald scalp (excluding eyelids, lips and mucosa), i.e. AK grade I and II according to Olsen et. al. 1991.
  • To document and confirm the diagnosis of the investigators:
  • Photodocumentation of a representative lesion had to be evaluated and confirmed by an independent expert.
  • A pre-study biopsy had to be taken from a second representative AK lesion and was histopathologically evaluated by a dermato-pathological expert.
  • If the evaluation of the photo by the independent reviewer could not confirm the diagnosis of the investigator, then the biopsy result decided whether the subject was eligible for the study.
  • The AK lesions had to be discrete and quantifiable; the distance from one lesion to its neighbor lesion was greater than 1.0 cm
  • The diameter of each AK lesion was not less than 0.5 cm and not greater than 1.5 cm. The size of each baseline AK lesion was recorded by measuring the two largest perpendicular diameters. To describe irregular lesions (ellipsoidal) investigators measured the major and minor axis. Both axes had to be above the minimum of 0.5 cm and less than 1.5 cm.
  • The subjects were free of any significant physical abnormalities (e.g., tattoos, dermatoses) in the potential treatment area that might cause difficulty with examination or final evaluation.
  • The subjects were willing to stop using moisturizers and any other topical treatments with anti-aging products, vitamin A, vitamin C, and/or vitamin E containing ointments and creams, and green tea preparations during the study within the treatment area. Sunscreens were allowed, but were not to be applied in the treatment area within approximately 24 hours before a clinical visit with lesion count.
  • Women of childbearing potential were only allowed to participate in this study, if they used a highly effective method of contraception and had a negative serum pregnancy test.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Had known hypersensitivity to 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA).
  • Were subjects under immunosuppressive therapy.
  • Suffered from porphyria.
  • Showed hypersensitivity to porphyrins.
  • Suffered from photodermatoses.
  • Had inherited or acquired coagulation defects.
  • Had received medication with hypericin or systemically acting drugs with phototoxic or photoallergic potential such as psoralens, tetracyclines, nalidixic acid, furosemide, amiodarone, phenothiazines, quinolones, fibrates, or phytotherapy with St. John's wort, arnica, or valerian or topically applied phototoxic substances like tar, pitch, psoralens or some dyes like thiazide, methylene blue, toluidine blue, eosine, Bengal rose, acridine within 8 weeks prior to treatment with study drug and photodynamic therapy (PDT).
  • Had evidence of clinically significant, unstable medical conditions such as
  • metastatic tumor or tumor with high probability of metastatic spread
  • cardiovascular (NYHA class III, IV)
  • immunosuppressive
  • hematological, hepatic, renal, neurological, endocrine
  • collagen-vascular
  • gastrointestinal
  • Had currently other malignant or benign tumors of the skin within the treatment a
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02799082) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search